Talk:WikiWikiWeb: Difference between revisions
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→merge: moved discussion http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AManorainjan&diff=186174&oldid=186171 here) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
As I see it, [[Portland Pattern Repository]] is an archive. No chance to edit. No new edits in this millennium. It might really been the first wiki ever.--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC) | As I see it, [[Portland Pattern Repository]] is an archive. No chance to edit. No new edits in this millennium. It might really been the first wiki ever.--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:This seems not to be the full truth: this wiki was dedicated to a specific problem. Maybe you can read something about it in the artima article [http://www.artima.com/intv/wiki.html Exploring with Wiki]. The wiki idea evolved since this first(!) successful approach; even today it's possible to contribute to this old wiki (if you meet their topic(s) and style). <br/> Best --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 10:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: '''Only now I see''' that you are talking about [[Portland Pattern Repository]] not [[WikiWikiWeb]]. I know that it was hard to distinguish these both wikis (or was it only one)?... <br/> I think one of them could get the ''goal reached'' status... Best --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 11:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:46, 26 November 2014
Is there a reason we're calling him Howard instead of Ward, that he uses? TedErnst | talk 16:18, 25 Jan 2006 (EST)
"Howard" is his legal name. "Ward" is the name that people on WikiWikiWeb usually use.
Okay, so why are we using Howard when the whole world knows him as Ward? TedErnst | talk 16:56, 25 Jan 2006 (EST)
Because it is more formal.
And why is that a good thing? TedErnst | talk 17:13, 25 Jan 2006 (EST)
Yes, what is so wrong with using PlainTalk words and names that are easy to understand? --DavidCary 14:55, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
merge
I suggest merging the WikiWikiWeb article into the Portland Pattern Repository article. Both of them are about the same wiki -- the first wiki, the wiki that WardCunningham started, right? --DavidCary 14:58, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
- Seems reasonable, although I'd have Portland Pattern Repository redirect to this article, as it is currently and probably best known as WikiWikiWeb. --MarvelZuvembie 20:17, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
- I now found another Page PortlandPatternRepository. I checked the URLs and it seems that WikiWikiWeb and PPR are indeed different wikis. Maybe the WikiWikiWeb was a child of the PPR, started as they discovered that there is more than patterns to be done by using this new technology? It seems that the PPR was the first wiki (without beeing named "wiki"). The best would be to ask Ward for the facts. Here some illustrating Links
- Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:59, 5 July 2010 (EDT)
As far as I understand, PortlandPatternRepository is the first wiki and was nicknamed the WikiWikiWeb. Will double check with WardCunningham Best, MarkDilley 5 July 2010
- Hi Mark, thank you in advance for doing that! I read on http://c2.com/ppr/, that the space named as "wiki" was created for exploring the not-quite-yet patterns we all carry around in our heads... :-) It seems to me that they discovered what wiki really could be after using it for a while for pattern collectiong. And, I'm very interested in Ward's answer. --Wolf | talk 16:07, 5 July 2010 (EDT)
So, what did Mark find out since 2010?
As I see it, Portland Pattern Repository is an archive. No chance to edit. No new edits in this millennium. It might really been the first wiki ever.--Manorainjan (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- This seems not to be the full truth: this wiki was dedicated to a specific problem. Maybe you can read something about it in the artima article Exploring with Wiki. The wiki idea evolved since this first(!) successful approach; even today it's possible to contribute to this old wiki (if you meet their topic(s) and style).
Best --Wolf | talk 10:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)- Only now I see that you are talking about Portland Pattern Repository not WikiWikiWeb. I know that it was hard to distinguish these both wikis (or was it only one)?...
I think one of them could get the goal reached status... Best --Wolf | talk 11:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Only now I see that you are talking about Portland Pattern Repository not WikiWikiWeb. I know that it was hard to distinguish these both wikis (or was it only one)?...