1,756
edits
WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions
→ChildPorn.info: new section
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (:So rewrite it. ~~~~) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→ChildPorn.info: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This policy will need improvement before it could be considered. While I like the idea of barring sicko material and self spam, the draft has been written in a stilted manner by L to indicate how ridiculous he thinks it is. [[Special:Contributions/173.255.192.138|173.255.192.138]] 18:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | This policy will need improvement before it could be considered. While I like the idea of barring sicko material and self spam, the draft has been written in a stilted manner by L to indicate how ridiculous he thinks it is. [[Special:Contributions/173.255.192.138|173.255.192.138]] 18:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:So rewrite it. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 19:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | :So rewrite it. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 19:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== ChildPorn.info == | |||
ChildPorn.info was a site that provided fairly neutral informative content, without linking to any child porn sites or otherwise facilitating or condoning illegal activity, and it got deleted. It's evident that listings of sites that cover those types of issues in a neutral way won't be tolerated on WikiIndex. I disagree with what the anon said, that Wikipedia covers pederasty and similar topics in a neutral way. Those articles are definitely biased against pederasty and so on, describing those behaviors as child sexual abuse. That's the reason why a listing for Wikipedia is allowed here. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 19:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||