1,756
edits
Talk:Nathania: Difference between revisions
→Speedy deletion tag removed
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
To Nathan, this comment: you do not get to create enormous disruption, directly and indirectly, and mostly provocatively, then casually obtain deletion and thus a covering up of what happened. If you actually want to move on, say so. If you wish to repudiate the ideas you promoted -- or appeared to promote -- say so. Request support. But continuing in isolation, just making whatever fuss appears to you as important on a day, putting up wikis, taking them down, putting them up again, taking them down again, all based on short-term reactions, and arguing ad nauseum, no. You have wasted a great deal of wiki user time. Stop it. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | To Nathan, this comment: you do not get to create enormous disruption, directly and indirectly, and mostly provocatively, then casually obtain deletion and thus a covering up of what happened. If you actually want to move on, say so. If you wish to repudiate the ideas you promoted -- or appeared to promote -- say so. Request support. But continuing in isolation, just making whatever fuss appears to you as important on a day, putting up wikis, taking them down, putting them up again, taking them down again, all based on short-term reactions, and arguing ad nauseum, no. You have wasted a great deal of wiki user time. Stop it. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:The page is obviously the kind of stuff that Koavf was complaining about as being part of a pattern of self-promotion and spam. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | :The page is obviously the kind of stuff that Koavf was complaining about as being part of a pattern of self-promotion and spam. | ||
:Not to mention, someone wrote in an official court document, regarding Nathania, "Friend and I discovered Nathan had started an online journal, detailing our relationship. In this journal, he acknowledges that I have asked him multiple times to stop contacting me, but states that I am still 'bound to him because of the marriage contract' and that he 'wants to make sure I cannot shut him out, no matter how hard I try.' He states he will hire a private investigator to find me, and that he plans on writing me more letters, in order to get me to come back to him. Because I deleted all online accounts to avoid him, this hate blog is the first result on Google when searching my name." Magistrate Jayne Candea-Ramsey wrote, "The Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter; that Larson, Nathan Daniel (Restrained Person) constitutes a credible threat, that an imminent danger exists to the life and health of the Protected Persons named in this action, and sufficient cause exists for the issuance of a Civil Protection Order." Thus, the listing of Nathania would probably be considered prohibited content under doxing grounds too. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||