Wikimedia Meta-Wiki: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(update stats, wikilinks, fix red links)
(fix Template:Wikimedia Foundation redirect, update stats, additional wikilinks, alphabetically sort language cats, include inline citations as interwiki prose links)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wiki
{{Wiki
|URL              = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org
|URL              = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
|logo            = https://upload.Wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/b/bc/Wiki.png
|logo            = https://upload.Wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/b/bc/Wiki.png
|recentchanges URL= https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&limit=500
|recentchanges URL= https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&limit=750
|wikinode URL    = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiNode
|wikinode URL    = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiNode
|about URL        = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:About
|about URL        = https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:About
Line 14: Line 14:
|backupurl        = http://dumps.wikimedia.org/metawiki/
|backupurl        = http://dumps.wikimedia.org/metawiki/
}}{{TOCright}}
}}{{TOCright}}
{|style="float:left; border:1px solid #BBB; margin:auto .75em .25em .25em"
[[File:Wikimedia Meta-Wiki.jpg|frame|left|original Meta-Wiki logo]]
|-style="font-size:90%; text-align:center"
|[[File:Wikimedia Meta-Wiki.jpg]]
original Meta-Wiki logo
|}
{{Size <!--see Template:Size for full detail-->
{{Size <!--see Template:Size for full detail-->
|pages= 63,548
|pages= 68,310
|statistics URL= https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
|statistics URL= https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
|wikiFactor= <!--1 - preferred; if unknown leave void; see: Category:wikiFactor for help-->
|wikiFactor= <!--1 - preferred; if unknown leave void; see: Category:wikiFactor for help-->
|wikiFactor URL= <!--http://stats.grok.se/meta/top-->
|wikiFactor URL= <!--http://stats.grok.se/meta/top-->
}}(As of: 2017-01-25)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated-->
}}(As of: 2017-05-12)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated-->
'''Wikimedia Meta-Wiki''' – this '{{tag|meta}}' [[wiki]] is used by the {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF) to act as a central primary coordination [[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] for all of their 'projects' and activities, which include running [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] and various sister projects, and also originally included developing their own [[:Category:Wiki Engine|wiki engine]] software, known as {{tag|MediaWiki}}.


This meta {{tag|wiki}} also used to include a lot of information about the MediaWiki wiki engine; including user manuals, installation manuals, and development information; however, this has now all been moved to the [[MediaWiki.org]] wiki (a more logical place for it). Inevitably, the discussion pages related to those manuals start to act as a kind of support forum, but there are [[mw:Communication|other channels]] for seeking user/[[Sysop|admin]]/development support.
'''Wikimedia Meta-Wiki''', also known as '''Meta-Wiki''', and internally within the {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF) as merely '''Meta''' – this '{{tag|meta}}' [[wiki]] is used by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) to act as a central primary coordination [[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] for all of their '[[wmf:Our_projects|projects]]' and activities; which include running [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] and various sister projects, and also originally included developing their own [[:Category:Wiki Engine|wiki engine]] software, known as {{tag|MediaWiki}}.
 
This meta {{tag|wiki}} also used to include a lot of {{tag|information}} about the MediaWiki wiki engine; including user manuals, installation manuals, and development information.  However, this has now all been moved to the [[MediaWiki.org]] wiki (a more logical place for it). Inevitably, the [[Talk page|discussion pages]] related to those manuals start to act as a kind of support forum, but there are [[mw:Communication|other channels]] for seeking user/[[Sysop|admin]]/development support.


===Purposes===
===Purposes===
The main purposes of Wikimedia Meta-Wiki are to help facilitate:
The main purposes of Wikimedia Meta-Wiki are to help facilitate:
#Discussion and formulation of {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF) projects, in particular {{tag|policy}} discussion relevant to across projects, such as open-content [[:Category:Wiki License|licensing]].  The central venue for discussion is the [[Wikimedia Forum]].  Some high-level discussions, held mainly in [[:Category:FoundedIn2009|2009]], were split to [[Wikimedia Strategic Planning]] (also known as Strategy Wiki – itself now [[Meta-Wiki:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Strategy Wiki|closed]]).
#Discussion and formulation of {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF) projects, in particular {{tag|policy}} discussion relevant to across projects, such as open-content [[:Category:Wiki License|licensing]].  The central venue for discussion is the [[Wikimedia Forum]].  Some high-level discussions, held mainly in [[:Category:FoundedIn2009|2009]], were split to [[Wikimedia Strategic Planning]] (also known as Strategy Wiki – itself now [[MetaWiki:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Strategy Wiki|closed]]).
#[[:Category:Wiki Multilingual|Interlingual]] (cross-wiki) and international coordination concerning the WMF projects and the Wikimedia movement in general, including discussion in [[:Category:Wiki Language|languages]] other than [[:Category:Wiki English|English]].  This includes requests (for pan-Wikimedia or other wikis), {{tag|translation}}s and news, and the description, {{tag|documentation}}, and discussion of real-life activities and facts related to the Wikimedia Foundation and affiliates.  This includes reports, events, outreach:, and grants.
#[[:Category:Wiki Multilingual|Interlingual]] (cross-wiki) and international coordination concerning the WMF projects and the Wikimedia movement in general; including discussion in [[:Category:Wiki Language|languages]] other than [[:Category:Wiki English|English]].  This includes requests (for pan-Wikimedia or other wikis), {{tag|translation}}s and news, and the description, {{tag|documentation}}, and discussion of real-life activities and facts related to the Wikimedia Foundation and affiliates.  This includes reports, events, outreach:, and grants.
#Writing and dissemination of personal {{tag|essays}} about WMF projects.  Because these are usually not delivered from a [[neutral point of view]], they are often summarized on neutral issues pages from multiple {{tag|Point of view|points of view}}.  There is a degree of freedom in determining what is related to Wikimedia projects, which makes Meta also a [[meatball wiki]] of sorts; discussing such matters as [[wiki culture]] and patterns.  This role includes more formal {{tag|research}} and related discussion.
#Writing and dissemination of personal {{tag|essays}} about WMF projects.  Because these are usually not delivered from a [[neutral point of view]], they are often summarized on neutral issues pages from multiple {{tag|Point of view|points of view}}.  There is a degree of freedom in determining what is related to Wikimedia projects, which makes Meta also a [[meatball wiki]] of sorts; discussing such matters as [[wiki culture]] and patterns.  This role includes more formal {{tag|research}} and related discussion.


The third purpose, essays, has not actually resulted in a large number of essays; only something in the low triple digits.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Category:Essays|ref]]</sup> Likewise, there are not many issues pages.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Category:Issues|ref]]</sup> Meta is specifically excluded from the list of projects that adhere to a neutral point of view.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Neutral point of view|ref]]</sup>  Although theoretically,<sup>[[meta-wiki:Meta:Inclusion policy|ref]]</sup> Meta is a place for debate and advocacy concerning controversial policies and practices, behaving in too opinionated of a manner concerning contentious issues has resulted in [[block]]s and bans.
The third purpose, [[MetaWiki:Category:Essays|essays]], has not actually resulted in a large number of essays; only something in the low triple digits.  Likewise, there are not many [[MetaWiki:Category:Issues|issues]] pages. Meta is specifically excluded from the list of projects that adhere to a [[:Category:NPOV|neutral point of view]].<sup>[[MetaWiki:Neutral point of view|ref]]</sup>  Although theoretically,<sup>[[MetaWiki:Meta:Inclusion policy|ref]]</sup> Meta is a place for debate and advocacy concerning controversial policies and practices, behaving in too opinionated of a manner concerning contentious issues has resulted in [[block]]s and bans.


{{tag|Elections}} of Wikimedia Foundation board members,<sup>[[meta-wiki:Board elections|ref]]</sup> stewards,<sup>[[meta-wiki:Stewards/Elections|ref]]</sup> global [[sysop]]s,<sup>[[meta-wiki:Steward requests/Global permissions#Requests for global sysop permissions|ref]]</sup> etc., occur at Meta-Wiki, and sometimes users of all projects are invited to comment on proposed global policies at Meta.  Sometimes, users make complaints about what is going on at other projects, if it appears that the sysops of those projects have run amok, and that intervention from stewards may be necessary.  This is usually only allowed when the projects are relatively small and it is clear that the sysops are going against the will of the community; otherwise, the argument will be raised the Meta is not an appeals court.<sup>[[meta-wiki:What Meta is not|ref]]</sup>  The Requests for Comment (RFC) page is a venue for these types of complaints, as well as debate on a wide variety of other matters, such as policy; proposals for what to do with wikis that are in [[:Category:In preparation|incubation]], or that are proposed to be brought under the Wikimedia Foundation umbrella; and requests for global bans.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Requests for comment|ref]]</sup>
{{tag|Elections}} of Wikimedia Foundation board members,<sup>[[MetaWiki:Board elections|ref]]</sup> [[steward]]s,<sup>[[MetaWiki:Stewards/Elections|ref]]</sup> global [[sysop]]s,<sup>[[MetaWiki:Steward requests/Global permissions#Requests for global sysop permissions|ref]]</sup> etc., occur at Meta-Wiki; and sometimes users of all projects are invited to comment on proposed global policies at Meta.  Sometimes, [[user]]s make complaints about what is going on at other projects, if it appears that the sysops of those projects have run amok, and that intervention from stewards may be necessary.  This is usually only allowed when the projects are relatively small, and it is clear that the sysops are going against the will of the community; otherwise, the argument will be raised the Meta is not an appeals court.<sup>[[MetaWiki:What Meta is not|ref]]</sup>  The [[Requests for Comment]] (RFC) page is a venue for these types of complaints, as well as debate on a wide variety of other matters, such as policy; proposals for what to do with wikis that are in [[:Category:In preparation|incubation]], or that are proposed to be brought under the Wikimedia Foundation umbrella; and requests for global bans.<sup>[[MetaWiki:Requests for comment|ref]]</sup>


Meta is also the location of the global [[spam blacklist]]<sup>[[meta-wiki:Spam blacklist|ref]]</sup> and the [[interwiki map]].<sup>[[meta-wiki:Interwiki map|ref]]</sup>
Meta is also the location of the global [[spam blacklist]]<sup>[[MetaWiki:Spam blacklist|ref]]</sup> and the [[interwiki map]].<sup>[[MetaWiki:Interwiki map|ref]]</sup>


===Culture===
===Culture===
A lot of high-level [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation people|Wikimedia Foundation staff members, stewards, global sysops]], etc. frequent Meta.  Many of them use it as their 'home base', and ask that users on other projects contact them there.  As a result of these users being so readily accessible on-wiki, and rubbing shoulders now and then with other Meta users in the course of carrying out their duties, participating in the global wiki-governance aspects of Meta, and responding to communications; other Meta users tend to become at least superficially acquainted with them.  Accordingly, disputes that occur on Meta often quickly get escalated to the highest levels of WMF, with complaints being posted on those [[WikiIndex:Talk Pages for Wiki People|users' talk pages]], which would not be the case on other wikis.  Thus, it is fairly common to see, for example, attempts to drag high ranking Wikimedia legal counsel into conflicts that would, on another wiki, be settled at a much lower level.
A lot of high-level [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation people|Wikimedia Foundation staff members, stewards, global sysops]], etc., frequent Meta.  Many of them use it as their 'home base', and ask that [[user]]s on other projects contact them on Meta-Wiki.  As a result of these users being so readily accessible on-wiki, and rubbing shoulders now and then with other Meta users in the course of carrying out their duties, participating in the global wiki-governance aspects of Meta, and responding to communications; other Meta users tend to become at least superficially acquainted with them within the [[wikisphere]].  Accordingly, disputes that occur on Meta often quickly get escalated to the highest levels of WMF, with complaints being posted on those [[WikiIndex:Talk Pages for Wiki People|users' talk pages]], which would not be the case on other wikis.  Thus, it is fairly common to see, for example, attempts to drag high ranking Wikimedia legal counsel into conflicts that would, on another wiki, be settled at a much lower level.


It is fairly easy to get [[block]]ed or banned from Meta, often with little explanation or with a vague and/or misleading explanation.  Usually, the blocks for common [[vandal]]ism are for lengthier periods than would be the case on [[English Wikipedia]].  Although there is no Arbitration Committee (ArbComm), the goings-on at Meta are not completely transparent because there is a great deal of [[revision deletion]] that occurs there.
It is fairly easy to get [[block]]ed or banned from Meta; often with little explanation, or with a vague and/or misleading explanation.  Usually, the blocks for common [[vandal]]ism are for lengthier periods than would be the case on [[English Wikipedia]].  Although there is no [[Arbitration Committee]] (ArbComm); the goings-on at Meta are not completely transparent, because there is a great deal of [[revision deletion]] that occurs there.


As is the case on [[MediaWiki.org]], Meta sysops typically have free rein to do what they wish, as the community does not exercise much oversight over them.  The difference is that there is more likelihood of disputes because of the controversial subject matter (policies, etc.) that are discussed at Meta, so users are more likely to get blocked.  The equivalent of an administrators' noticeboard incidents page is 'Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat' (RFH).<sup>[[meta-wiki:Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat|ref]]</sup> As is the case on [[English Wikipedia]], repeated bickering tends to result in warnings and/or eventual blocks for the participants.
As is the case on [[MediaWiki.org]], Meta [[sysop]]s typically have free rein to do what they wish, as the community does not exercise much oversight over them.  The difference is that there is more likelihood of disputes, because of the controversial subject matter (policies, etc.,) that are discussed at Meta, so users are more likely to get blocked.  The equivalent of an administrators' noticeboard incidents page is '[[MetaWiki:Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat|Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat]]' (RFH). As is the case on [[English Wikipedia]], repeated bickering tends to result in warnings and/or eventual blocks for the participants.


Essentially, the procedure on Meta, as on many other wikis, is that if a [[sysop]] warns a user that a behavior he is engaging in must stop, then he can either (1) stop, (2) communicate with other sysops through non-public channels (e.g. email) and try to get those sysops to warn the other sysop to back off, or (3) take the matter to a public forum for community input.  However, the third option is risky because it can be viewed as disruptive and result in blocks or bans.  If the sysop blocks the user for such 'disruption', and no other sysop is willing to reverse the block, then the block stands, unless someone else who is not yet blocked takes the matter to a public forum such as RFH and gets the community to reverse the decision.
Essentially, the procedure on Meta, as on many other wikis, is that if a [[sysop]] warns a user that a behaviour he is engaging in must stop, then he can either (1) stop, (2) communicate with other sysops through non-public channels (e.g. email) and try to get those sysops to warn the other sysop to back off, or (3) take the matter to a public forum for community input.  However, the third option is very risky, because it can be viewed as disruptive, and result in blocks or bans.  If the sysop blocks the user for such 'disruption', and no other sysop is willing to reverse the block, then the block stands, unless someone else who is not yet blocked takes the matter to a public forum such as RFH and gets the community to reverse the decision.


Dissident views on some topics are considered so disruptive that, even though they are on-topic for Meta-Wiki given its stated mission, they cannot be expressed.  The rationale behind disallowing the wisdom of suppressing these views from being openly debated or even challenged is that this too would be contentious.  Therefore, the meta-discussion, and meta-meta-discussions, and so on, are suppressed as well.  There is no equivalent to the [[wp:Previous question|previous question]] or [[wp:Objection to the consideration of the question|objection to the consideration of the question]] that would allow the community to vote on a matter without discussion.
Dissident views on some [[:Category:Wiki Topic|topics]] are considered so disruptive that, even though they are on-topic for Meta-Wiki given its stated mission, they cannot be expressed.  The rationale behind disallowing the wisdom of suppressing these views from being openly debated or even challenged: is that this too would be contentious.  Therefore, the meta-discussion, and meta-meta-discussions, and so on, are suppressed as well.  There is no equivalent to the [[wp:Previous question|previous question]] or [[wp:Objection to the consideration of the question|objection to the consideration of the question]] that would allow the community to vote on a matter without discussion.


There are not many rules governing conduct, so it is left up to sysops to make their own judgments of what is appropriate or inappropriate.  Specifically, there are only seven policies applicable to Meta in particular.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Meta:Policies and guidelines|ref]]</sup> Meta has an 'anti 'snowball' policy' that prohibits speedy closure of discussions at this project, but in practice, sysops can and do close discussions summarily and implement what they think is best sometimes.<sup>[[meta-wiki:Meta:Snowball|ref]]</sup>
There are not many rules governing conduct, so it is left up to sysops to make their own judgments of what is appropriate or inappropriate.  Specifically, there are only seven [[MetaWiki:Meta:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] applicable to Meta in particular. Meta has an 'anti '[[MetaWiki:Meta:Snowball|snowball]]' policy', that prohibits speedy closure of discussions at this project, but in practice, sysops can and do close discussions summarily, and implement what they think is best sometimes.


The [[user]]s of Meta-Wiki tend to be more {{tag|multilingual}} than those of other projects, and much of the editing that goes on consists of {{tag|translation}}s of pages.
The [[user]]s of Meta-Wiki tend to be more {{tag|multilingual}} than those of other projects, and much of the [[edit]]ing that goes on consists of {{tag|translation}}s of pages.


===See also===
===See also===
*[[Template:SeeWMF-Meta]] — a 'see also' template for linking directly to articles on Meta-Wiki
*[[Template:SeeWMF-Meta]] — a 'see also' template used here on WikiIndex for linking directly to articles on Meta-Wiki
*[http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikispecial/EN/TablesWikipediaMETA.htm Wikimedia Meta-Wiki Statistics] — stats.Wikimedia.org at [[Wikimedia Statistics]]
*[https://stats.Wikimedia.org/wikispecial/EN/TablesWikipediaMETA.htm Wikimedia Meta-Wiki Statistics] — stats.Wikimedia.org at [[Wikimedia Statistics]]
*[http://www.wikistatistics.net/specials/meta Wikimedia Meta-Wiki Interactive Statistics] — from [[Wikistatistics.net]]
*[http://www.Wikistatistics.net/specials/meta Wikimedia Meta-Wiki Interactive Statistics] — from [[Wikistatistics.net]]
 
{{Wikimedia Foundation}}
{{Wikimedia}}
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation| ]]
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation| ]]
[[Category:Wiki English]]
[[Category:Wiki English]]<!--keep the following wiki languages categories alphabetically sorted-->
[[Category:Wiki Afrikaans]]
[[Category:Wiki Alemannic]]
[[Category:Wiki Alemannic]]
[[Category:Wiki Arabic]]
[[Category:Wiki Arabic]]
[[Category:Wiki Catalan]]
[[Category:Wiki Czech]]
[[Category:Wiki Czech]]
[[Category:Wiki Danish]]
[[Category:Wiki Danish]]
[[Category:Wiki German]]
[[Category:Wiki Dutch]]
[[Category:Wiki Esperanto]]
[[Category:Wiki Esperanto]]
[[Category:Wiki Spanish]]
[[Category:Wiki Finnish]]
[[Category:Wiki Persian]]
[[Category:Wiki Norwegian]]
[[Category:Wiki French]]
[[Category:Wiki French]]
[[Category:Wiki Finnish]]
[[Category:Wiki Galician]]
[[Category:Wiki Galician]]
[[Category:Wiki German]]
[[Category:Wiki Greek]]
[[Category:Wiki Hebrew]]
[[Category:Wiki Hebrew]]
[[Category:Wiki Hindi]]
[[Category:Wiki Hindi]]
[[Category:Wiki Hungarian]]
[[Category:Wiki Icelandic]]
[[Category:Wiki Icelandic]]
[[Category:Wiki Italian]]
[[Category:Wiki Italian]]
[[Category:Wiki Indonesian]]
[[Category:Wiki Japanese]]
[[Category:Wiki Japanese]]
[[Category:Wiki Korean]]
[[Category:Wiki Korean]]
[[Category:Wiki Malayalam]]
[[Category:Wiki Malayalam]]
[[Category:Wiki Dutch]]
[[Category:Wiki Norwegian]]
[[Category:Wiki Occitan]]
[[Category:Wiki Persian]]
[[Category:Wiki Polish]]
[[Category:Wiki Polish]]
[[Category:Wiki Portuguese]]
[[Category:Wiki Portuguese]]
[[Category:Wiki Romanian]]
[[Category:Wiki Russian]]
[[Category:Wiki Russian]]
[[Category:Wiki Spanish]]
[[Category:Wiki Swedish]]
[[Category:Wiki Swedish]]
[[Category:Wiki Swahili]]
[[Category:Wiki Swahili]]
[[Category:Wiki Tagalog]]
[[Category:Wiki Turkish]]
[[Category:Wiki Turkish]]
[[Category:Wiki Ukrainian]]
[[Category:Wiki Ukrainian]]
[[Category:Wiki Vietnamese]]
[[Category:Wiki Vietnamese]]
[[Category:Wiki Afrikaans]]
[[Category:Wiki Catalan]]
[[Category:Wiki Welsh]]
[[Category:Wiki Welsh]]
[[Category:Wiki Greek]]
[[Category:Wiki Hungarian]]
[[Category:Wiki Indonesian]]
[[Category:Wiki Occitan]]
[[Category:Wiki Romanian]]
[[Category:Wiki Tagalog]]
[[Category:FoundedIn2001]]<!--https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:About#Origins-->
[[Category:FoundedIn2001]]<!--https://Meta.Wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:About#Origins-->

Revision as of 01:15, 12 May 2017

https://upload.Wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/b/bc/Wiki.png Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
Recent changes
WikiNode
About
Mobile URL
Founded by:
Status: Vibrant
Language: Multilingual
Edit mode: OpenEdit
Wiki engine: MediaWiki
Wiki license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" is not in the list (Custom license, Attribution to contributing authors, Copyright to contributing authors, Site retains copyright, WTFPL, Licence Art Libre, Open Content License, Apache License, BSD Documentation License, FreeBSD Documentation License, ...) of allowed values for the "Wiki license" property.
Main topic: Wikimedia Foundation
Backups: unknown or dynamic date

Template:TOCright

original Meta-Wiki logo
Wiki size: 68,310 article pages see stats

(As of: 2017-05-12)

Wikimedia Meta-Wiki, also known as Meta-Wiki, and internally within the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) as merely Meta – this 'meta' wiki is used by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) to act as a central primary coordination wiki for all of their 'projects' and activities; which include running Wikipedia and various sister projects, and also originally included developing their own wiki engine software, known as MediaWiki.

This meta wiki also used to include a lot of information about the MediaWiki wiki engine; including user manuals, installation manuals, and development information. However, this has now all been moved to the MediaWiki.org wiki (a more logical place for it). Inevitably, the discussion pages related to those manuals start to act as a kind of support forum, but there are other channels for seeking user/admin/development support.

Purposes

The main purposes of Wikimedia Meta-Wiki are to help facilitate:

  1. Discussion and formulation of Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects, in particular policy discussion relevant to across projects, such as open-content licensing. The central venue for discussion is the Wikimedia Forum. Some high-level discussions, held mainly in 2009, were split to Wikimedia Strategic Planning (also known as Strategy Wiki – itself now closed).
  2. Interlingual (cross-wiki) and international coordination concerning the WMF projects and the Wikimedia movement in general; including discussion in languages other than English. This includes requests (for pan-Wikimedia or other wikis), translations and news, and the description, documentation, and discussion of real-life activities and facts related to the Wikimedia Foundation and affiliates. This includes reports, events, outreach:, and grants.
  3. Writing and dissemination of personal essays about WMF projects. Because these are usually not delivered from a neutral point of view, they are often summarized on neutral issues pages from multiple points of view. There is a degree of freedom in determining what is related to Wikimedia projects, which makes Meta also a meatball wiki of sorts; discussing such matters as wiki culture and patterns. This role includes more formal research and related discussion.

The third purpose, essays, has not actually resulted in a large number of essays; only something in the low triple digits. Likewise, there are not many issues pages. Meta is specifically excluded from the list of projects that adhere to a neutral point of view.ref Although theoretically,ref Meta is a place for debate and advocacy concerning controversial policies and practices, behaving in too opinionated of a manner concerning contentious issues has resulted in blocks and bans.

Elections of Wikimedia Foundation board members,ref stewards,ref global sysops,ref etc., occur at Meta-Wiki; and sometimes users of all projects are invited to comment on proposed global policies at Meta. Sometimes, users make complaints about what is going on at other projects, if it appears that the sysops of those projects have run amok, and that intervention from stewards may be necessary. This is usually only allowed when the projects are relatively small, and it is clear that the sysops are going against the will of the community; otherwise, the argument will be raised the Meta is not an appeals court.ref The Requests for Comment (RFC) page is a venue for these types of complaints, as well as debate on a wide variety of other matters, such as policy; proposals for what to do with wikis that are in incubation, or that are proposed to be brought under the Wikimedia Foundation umbrella; and requests for global bans.ref

Meta is also the location of the global spam blacklistref and the interwiki map.ref

Culture

A lot of high-level Wikimedia Foundation staff members, stewards, global sysops, etc., frequent Meta. Many of them use it as their 'home base', and ask that users on other projects contact them on Meta-Wiki. As a result of these users being so readily accessible on-wiki, and rubbing shoulders now and then with other Meta users in the course of carrying out their duties, participating in the global wiki-governance aspects of Meta, and responding to communications; other Meta users tend to become at least superficially acquainted with them within the wikisphere. Accordingly, disputes that occur on Meta often quickly get escalated to the highest levels of WMF, with complaints being posted on those users' talk pages, which would not be the case on other wikis. Thus, it is fairly common to see, for example, attempts to drag high ranking Wikimedia legal counsel into conflicts that would, on another wiki, be settled at a much lower level.

It is fairly easy to get blocked or banned from Meta; often with little explanation, or with a vague and/or misleading explanation. Usually, the blocks for common vandalism are for lengthier periods than would be the case on English Wikipedia. Although there is no Arbitration Committee (ArbComm); the goings-on at Meta are not completely transparent, because there is a great deal of revision deletion that occurs there.

As is the case on MediaWiki.org, Meta sysops typically have free rein to do what they wish, as the community does not exercise much oversight over them. The difference is that there is more likelihood of disputes, because of the controversial subject matter (policies, etc.,) that are discussed at Meta, so users are more likely to get blocked. The equivalent of an administrators' noticeboard incidents page is 'Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat' (RFH). As is the case on English Wikipedia, repeated bickering tends to result in warnings and/or eventual blocks for the participants.

Essentially, the procedure on Meta, as on many other wikis, is that if a sysop warns a user that a behaviour he is engaging in must stop, then he can either (1) stop, (2) communicate with other sysops through non-public channels (e.g. email) and try to get those sysops to warn the other sysop to back off, or (3) take the matter to a public forum for community input. However, the third option is very risky, because it can be viewed as disruptive, and result in blocks or bans. If the sysop blocks the user for such 'disruption', and no other sysop is willing to reverse the block, then the block stands, unless someone else who is not yet blocked takes the matter to a public forum such as RFH and gets the community to reverse the decision.

Dissident views on some topics are considered so disruptive that, even though they are on-topic for Meta-Wiki given its stated mission, they cannot be expressed. The rationale behind disallowing the wisdom of suppressing these views from being openly debated or even challenged: is that this too would be contentious. Therefore, the meta-discussion, and meta-meta-discussions, and so on, are suppressed as well. There is no equivalent to the previous question or objection to the consideration of the question that would allow the community to vote on a matter without discussion.

There are not many rules governing conduct, so it is left up to sysops to make their own judgments of what is appropriate or inappropriate. Specifically, there are only seven policies and guidelines applicable to Meta in particular. Meta has an 'anti 'snowball' policy', that prohibits speedy closure of discussions at this project, but in practice, sysops can and do close discussions summarily, and implement what they think is best sometimes.

The users of Meta-Wiki tend to be more multilingual than those of other projects, and much of the editing that goes on consists of translations of pages.

See also

current Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) logo

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (WMF), founded 20 June 2003, is the wiki company and non-profit charitable organization[1] responsible for a very large number (over 900 in total) of very active collaborative user-generated wiki sites, which are grouped together by primary subject and known as a 'project'; as well as the wiki engine software initially developed by themselves, known as MediaWiki. The Wikimedia Foundations' major wiki projects started with Wikipedia (encyclopedia), and subsequently expanded to include Wiktionary (dictionary and thesaurus), Wikiquote (quotations), Wikibooks (open content textbooks), Wikisource (free content primary-source and secondary-source texts), Wikinews (news source), Wikiversity (open learning community), Wikispecies (free species directory), and many others as listed below. Most of these 'projects' have separate wiki site versions written in many different languages. There is also the Wikimedia Commons (shared multilingual repository for documents, images, videos, and other media and text files), and the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki (multilingual coordination of issues common to all Wikimedia projects). The Wikimedia Foundations' global reach is nurtured in its Incubator, where all new language versions for all projects are initiated and developed before being launched as a new separate wiki site. The Foundations' most recent major multi-language wiki project, Wikivoyage (a 'travelpedia'), was inducted to WMF in late 2012 (having being independently established in 2006). Also launched in 2012 was Wikidata (a major multilingual central space knowledge base for structured data used on all WMF projects). The newest WMF project is Wikifunctions, launched in mid 2023, is a library of code functions in many different programming languages.

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. is a member of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). Furthermore, the Wikimedia Foundation is a United States 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, granted April 2005, and headquartered at 1 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco County, State of California 94104, United States of America.[2]

All Wikimedia Foundation projects, wiki sites, portals, and websites (view • edit • talk)

Wikipedia • Wiktionary • Wikiquote • Wikibooks • Wikisource • Wikinews • Wikiversity • Wikispecies • MediaWiki.org • Commons • Commons Archive • Wikidata • Wikidata Test • Wikivoyage • Meta-Wiki • Incubator • Wikitech • Wikitech Test • Wikifunctions • Wikimedia Foundation •

Chapters • Thematic organizations • User groups • Wikimania • Outreach • Labs • Toolserver • Toolforge • Statistics • Phabricator • Beta Cluster • Downloads • Analytics • Software Releases • Documentation • Lists • Blog • Shop • Donate • Login • Diff • API Portal • Developer Portal • Global Search

original Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) logo from 2003
subsequent Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) logo
Wikimedia Foundation private and management wikis

Board • BoardGovCom • Foundation Governance • Office • Executive • Internal • Affiliations Committee • OTRS • Collab • Movement Roles • Audit Committee • Search Committee • Advisory Board • Quality • Usability Initiative • Strategic Planning • SP-Com • Stewards • CheckUser • Advisors • Thank You • Vote

Wikimedia Foundation hosting services

Wikimedia Cloud Services • Wikimedia Cloud VPS

External links
Official WMF social media and networking
Further reading
Any red links above need the {{Wiki}} infobox template (if appropriate), their Wikimedia Foundation wiki site (or website) URLs, the {{Wikimedia-stub}} template (if needed), and this {{Wikimedia Foundation}} navigation template added.
Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Meta-Wiki&oldid=198289"