Bureaucrats, interwiki, staff, Administrators
2,182
edits
(→about tags: sure, I'm participating) |
|||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
One potential problem to consider, at least on talk pages, is the mediawiki feature of the plus sign at the top of the page. This allows someone to add a comment in a new section at the bottom of the page automatically without having to edit the whole page. This new section will be below your footer, unless you get John to hard-code the footer. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 12:00, 23 Jan 2006 (EST) | One potential problem to consider, at least on talk pages, is the mediawiki feature of the plus sign at the top of the page. This allows someone to add a comment in a new section at the bottom of the page automatically without having to edit the whole page. This new section will be below your footer, unless you get John to hard-code the footer. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 12:00, 23 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
---- | |||
Bravo! I think the tag template is a brilliant way to allow people to add a new category to an article easily and have it display on both the article and the category area on the bottom. Mark pointed out to me last night that it might be even better for the template not to automatically bullet the text because that way we could also embed the tag into a paragraph. That makes sense to me because then we could use it that way, or bullet it if we wanted to with an asterisk as usual. I think this also solves the problem of having to make a large heading (folksonomy, tagging, caregories) and have it appear near the bottom of the page. --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 12:12, 23 Jan 2006 (EST) | |||
---- | ---- | ||