Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Category talk:New: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "WikiBirthday" to "wiki birthday"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki Status" to "Wiki status") |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "WikiBirthday" to "wiki birthday") |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::I like the "birth" (or founding?) cat idea. It doesn't require updating - stuff that is in recent "founding date" cats is new. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 18:46, 25 October 2009 (EDT) | ::::I like the "birth" (or founding?) cat idea. It doesn't require updating - stuff that is in recent "founding date" cats is new. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 18:46, 25 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
I find it useful to let people know that a wiki is new. I like the idea of adding a wikis birthday, (see [http:// | I find it useful to let people know that a wiki is new. I like the idea of adding a wikis birthday, (see [http://wiki birthday.org wiki birthday.org]. If we keep the new status - then yea, in x months it should be replaced by another [[:Category:Wiki status|wiki status]]. [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:I see the "New" category as being distinct from [[:Category:Dormant|"Dormant"]]. Many new wikis might appear to be dormant, primarily because they haven't caught on yet. Of course, some may never become very active. I think it's a useful definition to let people know that it may not have a lot of activity or content yet. The status probably should change to "Active" or "Dormant" after a suitable period has passed. Of course, that would require someone to monitor the listing or monitor the "New" category. In practice, I suspect that the entries will only be updated in a haphazard fashion. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:41, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | :I see the "New" category as being distinct from [[:Category:Dormant|"Dormant"]]. Many new wikis might appear to be dormant, primarily because they haven't caught on yet. Of course, some may never become very active. I think it's a useful definition to let people know that it may not have a lot of activity or content yet. The status probably should change to "Active" or "Dormant" after a suitable period has passed. Of course, that would require someone to monitor the listing or monitor the "New" category. In practice, I suspect that the entries will only be updated in a haphazard fashion. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:41, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | ||