User talk:Peu: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎tour bus: answer)
Line 17: Line 17:
:: ''finally'' I would hide unknown sized and unknown TBS's but I would list at least the unknown sizes in a category. --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 18:49, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
:: ''finally'' I would hide unknown sized and unknown TBS's but I would list at least the unknown sizes in a category. --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 18:49, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
::: To answer the language question, my question back would be "how are they used?"  Are their two different tour bus routes stopping that that wiki, one for each language?  What do you think we should do? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:40, 22 October 2006 (EDT)
::: To answer the language question, my question back would be "how are they used?"  Are their two different tour bus routes stopping that that wiki, one for each language?  What do you think we should do? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:40, 22 October 2006 (EDT)
:::: To your question: If there are two pages they are the translation of each other, as far as I can see - sometimes a little bit differing by mistake. In my opinion we should prefer the page in the original wiki-language (if there is one) to the english version --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 06:38, 22 October 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:38, 22 October 2006

Size

Size was something proposed by a sometime contributor and it's never really caught on. Maybe your proposal could be the spark that Size needs to get started? Maybe there isn't enough energy here for yet another method of categorization. I'd say go for it, if you like, especially if you can do some without breaking any others. TedErnst | talk 17:04, 17 October 2006 (EDT)

thanks, I will try to size something --Peu 17:11, 17 October 2006 (EDT)

Using your name

Thanks, Wolf!! TedErnst | talk 11:51, 20 October 2006 (EDT)

tour bus

can the tour bus stops also be added as an optional field in the wiki template? TedErnst | talk 09:13, 21 October 2006 (EDT)

yes it can, but should it be??? I found it greeaat tooo, but the new wiki-box is...
...(will be) now flexible enough to add new fields if needed. Lets watch TourBusStops a little... --Peu 16:51, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
The tour bus stops in teh world are finite and known. If someone's going to be adding any of them here, they might as well be in the wiki template, even if it's just for 5 or 10 sites. They don't have to appear in the template that it's unknown, right? Let's just leave the template blank if that field doesn't appear. In fact, that might be a good thing to do for the size field as well, leave the structured data box blank. I don't have a problem with a SizeUnknown field, but I don't think there's any reason to have a TourBusStop unknown. The reason to add it now is so it doesn't have to be converted later, should we decide to add it, and many sites already have a TBS listed on their page. TedErnst | talk 18:29, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
The size was for me (personally) very important for the decision to look closer at a listed wiki or not (as a former WikiIndex user, that's why I'm here, that was my starting point on WikiIndex). I find the TBS very interesting, but I noticed it today the first time; there were only a few Pages with TBS's. Let's integrate it into the Wiki-Template. Unknown sizes should be listed, it's for quality measurement (active wikis reach from 1 pages up to 2000).
Another question about TBS, what do we do if there are 2 links native and english?
finally I would hide unknown sized and unknown TBS's but I would list at least the unknown sizes in a category. --Peu 18:49, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
To answer the language question, my question back would be "how are they used?" Are their two different tour bus routes stopping that that wiki, one for each language? What do you think we should do? TedErnst | talk 01:40, 22 October 2006 (EDT)
To your question: If there are two pages they are the translation of each other, as far as I can see - sometimes a little bit differing by mistake. In my opinion we should prefer the page in the original wiki-language (if there is one) to the english version --Peu 06:38, 22 October 2006 (EDT)