211
edits
WikiIndex talk:Spam control policy: Difference between revisions
m
What happens if spam slips through
mNo edit summary |
m (What happens if spam slips through) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
To lessen the load on admins, it would be an interesting experiment to allow even anons to delete pages. Since this would be too much power for non-loggedin users, what if blanking a page, or some other special minimal contents, started a page-delete count-down clock, say about 24 hrs, after which the page would auto-delete. If anyone did any edits to the page in the meantime, the clock would reset -- or go away, if the page were given real contents.--[[User:69.87.199.193|69.87.199.193]] 12:51, 22 February 2007 (PST) | To lessen the load on admins, it would be an interesting experiment to allow even anons to delete pages. Since this would be too much power for non-loggedin users, what if blanking a page, or some other special minimal contents, started a page-delete count-down clock, say about 24 hrs, after which the page would auto-delete. If anyone did any edits to the page in the meantime, the clock would reset -- or go away, if the page were given real contents.--[[User:69.87.199.193|69.87.199.193]] 12:51, 22 February 2007 (PST) | ||
== What happens if spam slips through == | |||
Sysops can block the IP address of spammers, but is there any way that a user page could be marked as a suspected spammer, in order to get a sysop to come and check the account out? | |||