174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 07:29, 1 September 2009
, 1 September 2009→Criticism and rebuttals: is this the best criticism you have?
(→Criticism and rebuttals: okay think I'm done now) |
(→Criticism and rebuttals: is this the best criticism you have?) |
||
| Line 303: | Line 303: | ||
::::::::::::::[Nx removed Lumenos' criticism as well as the criticism section] 19:01, 31 August 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs) (5,879 bytes) (→Criticism and rebuttals - belongs on talk page - please don't accuse me of removing criticism because of bias) | ::::::::::::::[Nx removed Lumenos' criticism as well as the criticism section] 19:01, 31 August 2009 Nx (Talk | contribs) (5,879 bytes) (→Criticism and rebuttals - belongs on talk page - please don't accuse me of removing criticism because of bias) | ||
:::::::::::::::<Lumenos put the Criticism section back and put there a link to this section> Okay, boss. It is your move. I think I am going offline now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 19:19, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::<Lumenos put the Criticism section back and put there a link to this section> Okay, boss. It is your move. I think I am going offline now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 19:19, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::Seriously, is this the best criticism you can come up with? That the wiki has no chance to compete with Wikipedia, even though it's '''not even trying to'''? That's not even criticism. You can criticize Conservapedia for having delusions of grandeur (Schlafly said that they would surpass Wikipedia in a few years), but RationalWiki isn't even trying to be a general encyclopedia, and it actively enforces this by removing articles that do not fit its mission. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:29, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
===A very rare example of Lumenos misunderstanding=== | ===A very rare example of Lumenos misunderstanding=== | ||