Talk:Lumeniki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Phantom Hoovenator being all
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::So, what is it? The "norm"? In which case surely I could "own" the [[RationalWiki]] article. Or some freaks could own the [[Metapedia]] article. Or is it only "wrong" if... what? Mark, I think you need to figure out what this wiki is doing and get it to work how you want, because right now you are being yanked by your chains by internet freaks. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ::So, what is it? The "norm"? In which case surely I could "own" the [[RationalWiki]] article. Or some freaks could own the [[Metapedia]] article. Or is it only "wrong" if... what? Mark, I think you need to figure out what this wiki is doing and get it to work how you want, because right now you are being yanked by your chains by internet freaks. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::You got to help me make it look less freaky Huw. We can't have anyone knowing what they are gonna find there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | :::You got to help me make it look less freaky Huw. We can't have anyone knowing what they are gonna find there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:A stream of consciousness, you say? My gosh, I've never heard an outline described as such. When I hear "stream of consciousness" I reminds me of the days when [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Gonzo_journalism#Hunter_S._Thompson hunters] roamed the fruited plain. Huw the musician wouldn't be a fan, would he? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:28, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:28, 6 September 2009
Other users can edit this wiki, see [1]. Proxima Centauri 08:39, 30 July 2009 (EDT)
- Yes you can. I was able to edit through the Tor network also. Lumenos 04:41, 10 August 2009 (EDT)
Phantom Hoovenator being all block deletion happy
The stuff he was removing did seem a bit odd. Having the owner of a wiki write a rambling stream of consciousness description of their personal goals on a wikiindex article? Is that the norm here? Huw Powell 20:02, 5 September 2009 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say it was the norm, but it doesn't strike me as being 'wrong'. ~~ MarkDilley
- So, what is it? The "norm"? In which case surely I could "own" the RationalWiki article. Or some freaks could own the Metapedia article. Or is it only "wrong" if... what? Mark, I think you need to figure out what this wiki is doing and get it to work how you want, because right now you are being yanked by your chains by internet freaks. Huw Powell 06:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
- You got to help me make it look less freaky Huw. We can't have anyone knowing what they are gonna find there. Lumenos 12:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
- So, what is it? The "norm"? In which case surely I could "own" the RationalWiki article. Or some freaks could own the Metapedia article. Or is it only "wrong" if... what? Mark, I think you need to figure out what this wiki is doing and get it to work how you want, because right now you are being yanked by your chains by internet freaks. Huw Powell 06:07, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
- A stream of consciousness, you say? My gosh, I've never heard an outline described as such. When I hear "stream of consciousness" I reminds me of the days when hunters roamed the fruited plain. Huw the musician wouldn't be a fan, would he? Lumenos 14:28, 6 September 2009 (EDT)