1,136
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
→Deletions and Protections
| Line 1,389: | Line 1,389: | ||
(outdent) "Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict and clear up confusing line, hopefully" - There's no conflict! And there aren't three active sysops either, but that's another matter. Can you just move the descriptions back please? [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 04:21, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | (outdent) "Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict and clear up confusing line, hopefully" - There's no conflict! And there aren't three active sysops either, but that's another matter. Can you just move the descriptions back please? [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 04:21, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:In addition, the only controversial bit in ''any'' of the articles, the bit on RW's downtime, is now outdated. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:34, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | :In addition, the only controversial bit in ''any'' of the articles, the bit on RW's downtime, is now outdated. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:34, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Umm how are you judging that? I didn't feel like edit waring over the issue of allowing more criticism, but now it looks like we are headed for [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|entire pages devoted to criticism]]. I could be wrong. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:55, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity == | == Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity == | ||