1,136
edits
(→Nice Try: criticism was silenced long ago) |
|||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
:Is that the one where you refuse to respond to the arguments of others and go on with a hopeless condescending whining? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:45, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | :Is that the one where you refuse to respond to the arguments of others and go on with a hopeless condescending whining? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:45, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Nobody has made ''any'' arguments. That's the point. Nobody has any problem with any of the articles so why were they moved unilaterally? [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 13:02, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Nobody has made ''any'' arguments. That's the point. Nobody has any problem with any of the articles so why were they moved unilaterally? [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 13:02, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::People have come and posted criticisms, they have tried to put them in the articles. I posted a criticism. It was [[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|debated a little while and deleted without consensus]]. Later Nx apparently concluded that I had won. Sooooo why should the criticism be available to the public? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:58, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::Do you think that articles should avoid criticism? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:58, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
edits