Talk:Biohack: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Site is down presently: Marked with {{Cannot connect}}) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I've marked it with the <nowiki>{{Cannot connect}}</nowiki> template. If it remains in this status for several days, we should probably change its status to inactive. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 19:49, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | :I've marked it with the <nowiki>{{Cannot connect}}</nowiki> template. If it remains in this status for several days, we should probably change its status to inactive. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 19:49, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Still down. Plus isn't this like category spamming or something? Too many categories don't really help the reader to see the core point of the wiki. Or would you place Wikipedia in all available categories just because they have articles on everything? :s [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 17:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:35, 22 September 2009
do you think, this is a positive example for category inclusion? if so we should be much more generous for other wikis as well --Kardan 01:20, 19 December 2008 (EST)
Site is down presently
Biohack has a problem
Sorry! This site is experiencing technical difficulties.
Try waiting a few minutes and reloading.
(Can't contact the database server: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2) (localhost)) Lumenos 19:38, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
- I've marked it with the {{Cannot connect}} template. If it remains in this status for several days, we should probably change its status to inactive. --MarvelZuvembie 19:49, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
- Still down. Plus isn't this like category spamming or something? Too many categories don't really help the reader to see the core point of the wiki. Or would you place Wikipedia in all available categories just because they have articles on everything? :s Patheticcockroach 17:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)