Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
structured data categories are redundant at bottom, thus a little less important there.
(table of contents) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (structured data categories are redundant at bottom, thus a little less important there.) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
::: Why do you want the extra added categories to be listed before the ones in teh box? Shouldn't the ones in the box be the most important? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 00:58, 19 Jan 2006 (EST) | ::: Why do you want the extra added categories to be listed before the ones in teh box? Shouldn't the ones in the box be the most important? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 00:58, 19 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
The categories at the bottom are already redundant once, some may say twice because of the sidebar links. So adding the Folksonomy Categories in the front helps the richness of the site. I like that they are redundant at the bottom, but I think they are less valuable because they are the highlighted ones in the templete. Also, while this is a [[MediaWiki]], it is not [[Wikipedia]]. Best, [[MarkDilley]] :-) | |||
== table of contents == | == table of contents == | ||
Any time there are 3 or more (I think) headings on a page, the TOC pops up just before the first of them. Often there is introductory text before the first heading, so that ends up before the TOC. You can force NOTOC somehow, and you can also force TOCright, where the text will then wrap around. We'll have to figure those out. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 01:01, 19 Jan 2006 (EST) | Any time there are 3 or more (I think) headings on a page, the TOC pops up just before the first of them. Often there is introductory text before the first heading, so that ends up before the TOC. You can force NOTOC somehow, and you can also force TOCright, where the text will then wrap around. We'll have to figure those out. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 01:01, 19 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||