Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
(new wiki template) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (tagging / description / unknown engine --> OddMuse You can help!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| wiki_language = English | | wiki_language = English | ||
| wiki_editmode = OpenEdit | | wiki_editmode = OpenEdit | ||
| wiki_engine = | | wiki_engine = OddMuse | ||
| wiki_maintopic = Lifestyles | | wiki_maintopic = Lifestyles | ||
}} | }} | ||
== | ==consensus polling== | ||
ConsensusPolling is about winning together or refusing to play the game. Because it can be a laborious process, it is most appropriate when a group of individuals must collectively solve a problem that affects them all. It seeks to avoid voting for candidate options (see VotingIsEvil) when such a vote would generate winners and losers and thus divide the community that must support the result of the collective decision. | {{tag|ConsensusPolling}} is about winning together or refusing to play the game. Because it can be a laborious process, it is most appropriate when a group of individuals must {{tag|collectively}} solve a problem that affects them all. It seeks to avoid voting for candidate options (see [[:Meatball Wiki:VotingIsEvil]]) when such a vote would generate winners and losers and thus divide the community that must support the result of the collective decision. | ||
Rather than a menu of candidates to choose from, the entire process is controlled by an evolving Yes/No vote. The vote reflects the suitability of a single community-owned solution being generated through a process of collaborative CollectiveIntelligence | Rather than a menu of {{tag|candidates}} to choose from, the entire process is controlled by an evolving Yes/No vote. The vote reflects the suitability of a single community-owned solution being generated through a process of {{tag|collaborative}} {{tag|CollectiveIntelligence}}. All participants are free to change their {{tag|vote}} at any time. A yes vote says "I believe the current articulation of our solution is good enough," a no vote says "I have concerns that haven't been adequately addressed by the current solution." Only when the Yes votes pass some very high, pre-specified threshold (e.g., 90%) can the solution proposed be considered to reflect the {{tag|consensus}} of the {{tag|community}}. | ||