Nathania: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (jurist's opinion) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[[Category:FoundedIn2012]]<!--http://nathania.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages--> | [[Category:FoundedIn2012]]<!--http://nathania.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages--> | ||
[[Category:Childlove]] |
Revision as of 11:15, 25 October 2013
http://nathania.org/w/n.png | Nathania Recent changes WikiNode About [No Mobile URL] |
---|---|
Founded by: | |
Status: | Active |
Language: | English |
Edit mode: | OpenEdit |
Wiki engine: | MediaWiki |
Wiki license: | Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" is not in the list (Custom license, Attribution to contributing authors, Copyright to contributing authors, Site retains copyright, WTFPL, Licence Art Libre, Open Content License, Apache License, BSD Documentation License, FreeBSD Documentation License, ...) of allowed values for the "Wiki license" property. |
Main topic: | Personal |
Nathania is a bliki by Nathan Larson containing his own commentary as well as that of several sexually dissident US federal prisoners who were interviewed. It appears that the material is all inappropriate for the English Wikipedia and some of it contains personally-identifying information of private individuals, including minors. On 6 December 2012, Assistant Federal Public Defender Brooke Sealy Rupert explained the site:[1]
- Mr. Larson heard first-hand from fellow incarcerated individuals about sex offender laws, the treatment sex offenders received by various prison facilities, and the movement to challenge harsh sex offender sentencing practices. Consistent with Mr. Larson’s practice of seeking to help those seemingly shunned by society, particularly through writing, he began interviewing inmates, researching the issues, and writing articles.
On 7 December 2012, U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee expressed his concerns about the site:[2]
- I really don't have any objection to your having opinions about politics, about history, about government or anything. But when you start talking about sex with children and posting pictures of children in provocative poses in underwear, maybe not child pornography, but it's just odd that that would be a part of your website to me if your interest is to build something that everybody can participate in.
- When I look on Wikipedia, there's so much information there. You start an encyclopedia at A and go to Z, pedophilia is so far down the line and pictures of children in provocative poses is so far down the line that I'm not sure you could be there in 6 months or 8 months.
- So it's just strange and it's scarey. Because I have on many Fridays people come before me who say that they were on the Internet looking for adult pornography and somehow stumbled upon child pornography and got fascinated with it.
- And the federal law is five years in prison, ten years, very, very severe sentences that I'm imposing because we're concerned about people who want to traffic in and use that kind of material.
Wiki size: | 87 article pages see stats |
wikiFactor: | 1 info / verify |
(As of: 2013-10-25)