WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Hold the presses! Pope Catholic! Leucosticte argues!) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I removed the policy template to make this a proposed policy. It would need a lot of change to be appropriate. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 17:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | I removed the policy template to make this a proposed policy. It would need a lot of change to be appropriate. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 17:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:It's descriptive, not prescriptive, of WikiIndex practice. Can you provide any evidence that this is not the current practice? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | :It's descriptive, not prescriptive, of WikiIndex practice. Can you provide any evidence that this is not the current practice? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::(edit conflict with above). Leucosticte reverted my removal of the policy template. Actually, he trained me on Wikipedia, I'm a student of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DGAF WP:DGAF]. DGAF allows me to implement [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IAR WP:IAR], and I've done it with high success. Wikis are fun, if we don't care. If we care, well, that can get difficult | |||
::Needless to say, I reverted. It's not a policy because I Say It's Not, and the community will overrule me if it chooses. I trust communities, even when I don't. | |||
::Not worth providing proof. Waste of time. No documentation was provided of so-called "actual practice, a couple of deletions by a single administrator does not establish actual practice. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 17:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:57, 5 January 2015
Proposal = bad idea. The proposal is trolling. Several of Leucosticte's wikis were deleted, I think inappropriately. This proposal is one of his standard moves. I.e., instead of actually negotiating, argue and debate. Propose something extreme in an attempt to win an argument.
I removed the policy template to make this a proposed policy. It would need a lot of change to be appropriate. --Abd (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's descriptive, not prescriptive, of WikiIndex practice. Can you provide any evidence that this is not the current practice? Leucosticte (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict with above). Leucosticte reverted my removal of the policy template. Actually, he trained me on Wikipedia, I'm a student of WP:DGAF. DGAF allows me to implement WP:IAR, and I've done it with high success. Wikis are fun, if we don't care. If we care, well, that can get difficult
- Needless to say, I reverted. It's not a policy because I Say It's Not, and the community will overrule me if it chooses. I trust communities, even when I don't.
- Not worth providing proof. Waste of time. No documentation was provided of so-called "actual practice, a couple of deletions by a single administrator does not establish actual practice. --Abd (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)