WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions

Line 53: Line 53:
::::I see. Yes, it's a live wiki. And what I see leads me to conclude that Leucosticte is using BoyWiki as he uses all wikis. Leucosticte is not an admin there. He is not even a major user, but his content is the edgiest I've seen there. He's pushing that wiki toward confrontation. Boywiki is for "boylovers," which is not a sexual category, the wiki is explicit. By the way, as far as sexual content is concerned, Wikipedia is far more "adult."
::::I see. Yes, it's a live wiki. And what I see leads me to conclude that Leucosticte is using BoyWiki as he uses all wikis. Leucosticte is not an admin there. He is not even a major user, but his content is the edgiest I've seen there. He's pushing that wiki toward confrontation. Boywiki is for "boylovers," which is not a sexual category, the wiki is explicit. By the way, as far as sexual content is concerned, Wikipedia is far more "adult."
::::BoyWiki does not meet the criteria for prohibited content. One may possibly, by searching, find content there that is problematic, but that is true of many wikis. The wiki does not "solely to provide content that is potentially dangerous and harmful," the present wording, which I will also change. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 01:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
::::BoyWiki does not meet the criteria for prohibited content. One may possibly, by searching, find content there that is problematic, but that is true of many wikis. The wiki does not "solely to provide content that is potentially dangerous and harmful," the present wording, which I will also change. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 01:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::Would anyone care to place a friendly wager on the chances of the BoyWiki page being restored? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


== Controversial sites ==
== Controversial sites ==
1,756

edits