Category talk:Referata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Down: new section) |
(Undid revision 195272 by 73.47.71.127 (talk)) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Referata runs its own wiki, thats why I would prefer to have both, page ''and'' category. But having the structured data right on the category page would be better than having it not at all ;-) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:56, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | ::Referata runs its own wiki, thats why I would prefer to have both, page ''and'' category. But having the structured data right on the category page would be better than having it not at all ;-) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:56, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::Oh, I see, you are right. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:05, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | :::Oh, I see, you are right. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:05, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 1 February 2017
Make an own page?
... named Referata to add some structured stuff like
...and the category could be added to all referata-hosted wikis like Lumeniki.
What do you think?
Best regards Wolf | talk 05:33, 23 June 2010 (EDT)
- Hi Peu/Wolf! I put Lumeniki in category:Referata. I redirected Referata to category:Referata because that is how Wikia is.
- I know nothing about Semantic MediaWiki (Deutsch) Semantic Media Wiki (German)(English). I like Referata better than any other MediaWiki wiki farm (German) (English), but I don't use the Semantic MediaWiki functions at all.
- Lumenos 06:27, 23 June 2010 (EDT)
- Why not add structured stuff to category:Referata? Lumenos 06:35, 23 June 2010 (EDT)