Wikitech-l: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(tags, wikilinks)
(use proper Template:NotAWiki rather than direct cat, wikilinks)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:wikitech-l}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:wikitech-l}}<div style=float:right>{{NotAWiki}}</div>
'''wikitech-l''' is a {{tag|Communications|mailing}} list for the {{tag|MediaWiki}} development community.  The discussion threads tend to get rather lengthy, as people debate implementation options; often the conversations devolve into bike-shedding over insignificant details.  Most of the lengthy discussions concerning the most fundamental aspects of MediaWiki development take place on wikitech-l, rather than places like [[MediaZilla]], although the final debates leading to the ultimate decisions on architecture issues are usually made at synchronous communication venues; such as [[Internet Relay Chat]] (IRC) or {{tag|FaceToFace|in-person}} meetings.  Occasionally, someone breaches etiquette, usually by wording a criticism harshly; and dozens of posts follow, debating how bad the etiquette breach was, and whether people are overreacting.
'''wikitech-l''' is a {{tag|Communications|mailing}} list for the [[:Category:MediaWiki developers|MediaWiki development community]].  The discussion threads tend to get rather lengthy, as people debate implementation options; often the conversations devolve into bike-shedding over insignificant details.  Most of the lengthy discussions concerning the most fundamental aspects of {{tag|MediaWiki}} development take place on wikitech-l, rather than places like [[MediaZilla]], although the final debates leading to the ultimate decisions on architecture issues are usually made at synchronous communication venues; such as [[Internet Relay Chat]] (IRC) or {{tag|FaceToFace|in-person}} meetings.  Occasionally, someone breaches etiquette, usually by wording a criticism harshly; and dozens of posts follow, debating how bad the etiquette breach was, and whether people are overreacting.


Occasionally, an off-topic thread is launched by someone attempting to spam the listserv with his own theory of ethics or communication techniques, ostensibly as a proposal for adoption by the development community; these tend to attract dozens of comments by people interested in such {{tag|meta}}-issues, without resulting in any new policies or practices being agreed upon.
Occasionally, an off-topic thread is launched by someone attempting to spam the listserv with his own theory of ethics or communication techniques, ostensibly as a proposal for adoption by the development community; these tend to attract dozens of comments by people interested in such [[:Category:Meta|meta]]-issues, without resulting in any new [[:Category:Policy|policies]] or [[:Category:WikiConcept|practices]] being agreed upon.


;External links
;External link
*https://lists.Wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
*https://lists.Wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[[Category:NotAWiki]]
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation|*]]
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation]]

Revision as of 00:03, 28 November 2017

Template:NotAWiki

wikitech-l is a mailing list for the MediaWiki development community. The discussion threads tend to get rather lengthy, as people debate implementation options; often the conversations devolve into bike-shedding over insignificant details. Most of the lengthy discussions concerning the most fundamental aspects of MediaWiki development take place on wikitech-l, rather than places like MediaZilla, although the final debates leading to the ultimate decisions on architecture issues are usually made at synchronous communication venues; such as Internet Relay Chat (IRC) or in-person meetings. Occasionally, someone breaches etiquette, usually by wording a criticism harshly; and dozens of posts follow, debating how bad the etiquette breach was, and whether people are overreacting.

Occasionally, an off-topic thread is launched by someone attempting to spam the listserv with his own theory of ethics or communication techniques, ostensibly as a proposal for adoption by the development community; these tend to attract dozens of comments by people interested in such meta-issues, without resulting in any new policies or practices being agreed upon.

External link