User:Torchickens: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Yay necro)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi my name is Evie :] I love cute things, am super girly and feminine, and computer science; some natural sciences~.
'''The fun'''
Sanrio and Nintendo are awesome ^_^ as is Z80.
'''The serious'''
I don't know what to do with my life..
==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'==
==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'==
*[[:Category:Information|Information]] should be free and accessible to all.
*[[:Category:Information|Information]] should be free and accessible to all.
Line 8: Line 18:
**There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.
**There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.


'''The silly ^^'''
Infinite regression and first-cause 'paradoxes' are solvable because logic doesn't have to be linear.
[[Category:AccountUsed2011]]
[[Category:AccountUsed2011]]

Revision as of 02:35, 31 May 2021

Hi my name is Evie :] I love cute things, am super girly and feminine, and computer science; some natural sciences~.

The fun

Sanrio and Nintendo are awesome ^_^ as is Z80.

The serious

I don't know what to do with my life..

My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'

  • Information should be free and accessible to all.
    • I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
      • I support the Anti-Wikia Alliance to some extent. Wikia should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis.
      • However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply abandoning them and 'sporking' them on to an independent Wiki for later.
  • I reject the irony of Wikipedia's notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
    • There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.

The silly ^^

Infinite regression and first-cause 'paradoxes' are solvable because logic doesn't have to be linear.