Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:Koavf/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "EnglishSpeakers" to "English speakers") |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people") |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Notability of users== | ==Notability of users== | ||
"Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki | "Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki people]] says "this is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites". I would say that [[PeterKa]] probably considers himself part of the wiki community. Shall we change that page to say "this is a list of ''notable'' people . . ."? | ||
Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | ||