54
edits
Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war: Difference between revisions
Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war (edit)
Revision as of 23:48, 15 November 2008
, 15 November 2008no edit summary
No edit summary |
Jazzman831 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I don't really see how it's a comprimise... there's still a page about why Conservapedia is bad. How is this different than before? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 13:37, 15 November 2008 (EST) | :I don't really see how it's a comprimise... there's still a page about why Conservapedia is bad. How is this different than before? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 13:37, 15 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jazzman831 You're a Conservapedian]. I'm as RationalWikian. Neither of us is neutral. Not everybody will click onto the link to this page. Therefore it's a compromise. Here administrators don't inforce their decisions as happens at Conservapedia. Neutral admins will decide this. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:38, 15 November 2008 (EST) | ::[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jazzman831 You're a Conservapedian]. I'm as RationalWikian. Neither of us is neutral. Not everybody will click onto the link to this page. Therefore it's a compromise. Here administrators don't inforce their decisions as happens at Conservapedia. Neutral admins will decide this. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:38, 15 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::I'm also a sysop on RationalWiki. What's your point? | |||
:::This is linked to on [[Conservapedia]], so even though not everyone will read it, it's readily available to anyone who wants to look up Conservative encyclopedias. | |||
:::What is this wiki about? Is it about directing people towards wikis, or providing (one sided) criticisms of wikis? I checked out a couple popular wikis as a way to compare and see what a "good" wikiindex article would be. [[English Wikipedia]], '''the''' wiki, is described as "The English language Wikipedia, free encyclopedia that anyone can edit, neutral point of view, NPOV". [[Uncyclopedia]] has no criticism, [[Encyclopædia Dramatica]] has no criticism. [[RationalWiki]] has a "criticism" section, but it's used to criticise Conservapedia. The only criticism section I can find is in [[AboutUs]], but it is stated in plain, non-inflamatory language, and AboutUs was given a chance to refute the criticism section. My "bias" doesn't change these facts, does it? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:48, 15 November 2008 (EST) | |||