62
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Sysops and blocks
m (→Sysops and blocks: Formatting) |
|||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
:As long as it's done politely, I think it's appropriate. The long list of abuses (One editor did this; "nonsense" seems to mean anything factual) was fairly ridiculous. But helpful advice seems to be a good thing, and fairly "WikiWay" in that it is feedback and guidelines to help the community. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 12:17, 30 November 2008 (EST) | :As long as it's done politely, I think it's appropriate. The long list of abuses (One editor did this; "nonsense" seems to mean anything factual) was fairly ridiculous. But helpful advice seems to be a good thing, and fairly "WikiWay" in that it is feedback and guidelines to help the community. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 12:17, 30 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::But is this really Conservapedia's blocking ''policy''? I see one person's ''opinion'' of what it is. I haven't looked at the rewrite yet, though. I still think we shouldn't be evaluating the worth of the content or the experience of the wikis we list here. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:53, 1 December 2008 (EST) | ::But is this really Conservapedia's blocking ''policy''? I see one person's ''opinion'' of what it is. I haven't looked at the rewrite yet, though. I still think we shouldn't be evaluating the worth of the content or the experience of the wikis we list here. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:53, 1 December 2008 (EST) | ||
:::How can I put this politely? Conservapedia has a rather noticeable disconnect between its STATED policies for sysops and the way those sysops actually ACT. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 15:26, 4 December 2008 (EST) | |||