Category talk:Wiki language: Difference between revisions
(→Merge to "Language"?: sounds good - other opinions?) |
(== "Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin" ==) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 21:40, 3 September 2006 (EDT) | : Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 21:40, 3 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
== "Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin" == | |||
Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages. | |||
* categories like "[[:Category: Wiki Latin]]" | |||
* categories like "[[:Category: Latin]]" | |||
Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag. | |||
Category simplification proposal: | |||
* Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps [[:Category: linguistic]] or [[:Category: language]]. | |||
* Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories. | |||
Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion. | |||
Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest. | |||
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing? | |||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:17, 3 February 2009
Should there be a distinction between wikis that are bilingual (e.g. WikiIndex-English & French), multilingual (e.g. Wikimedia Commons-multiple languages used within the same wiki), and multiple languages (e.g. most Wikimedia Foundation projects, such as the Wikipedia that have versions in different languages [as subdomains])? User:BlankVerse | talk 00:44, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
Merge to "Language"?
Wiki Language is confusing - sounds like it's about wiki markup or some such thing. Merge into Category:Language? Articles in Category:Language can stay in the root category, and the subcategory can be for specific languages. --[[User:Singkong2005|Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) <small><sup>[[User talk:Singkong2005|talk]]</sup></small>]] 21:39, 2 September 2006 (EDT)
"Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin"
Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages.
- categories like "Category: Wiki Latin"
- categories like "Category: Latin"
Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag.
Category simplification proposal:
- Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps Category: linguistic or Category: language.
- Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories.
Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion.
Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing? --DavidCary 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST)