User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks for helping in the debate, I'm sorry I can't stop them getting at you as well because if I try they'll say I'm using admin status in a case that involves me. Usually this is a polite wiki but it is deteriorating rapidly and unless things improve they can look for someone else to look after the wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:39, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | Thanks for helping in the debate, I'm sorry I can't stop them getting at you as well because if I try they'll say I'm using admin status in a case that involves me. Usually this is a polite wiki but it is deteriorating rapidly and unless things improve they can look for someone else to look after the wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:39, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I have no issue with Lumenos; I am merely pointing out that you are not being attacked by zombie computers. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:46, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | :I have no issue with Lumenos; I am merely pointing out that you are not being attacked by zombie computers. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:46, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::I should add that I like you too Phantom Hoover, even though you | ::I should add that I like you too Phantom Hoover, even though you have apparently claimed to be "[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Dude a dude]" and [[Talk:RationalWiki#Edit_wars|I am critical of a number of your arguments]] as well. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:37, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I'm not sure what this is about. If this is in reference to the policy page, I'm not worried about my privacy. If this is about the edits to the RationalWiki article, I didn't post my edits intending them to be set in stone. When I came back and looked at the waring over that article I wondered if you weren't defending me or maybe following that etiquette policy? I don't think you should block people over that, at least not until we write some [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|policies]] that have community support. Otherwise who is to say what is trolling, vandalism, or unwarranted blocking in a case like that? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:59, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | :I'm not sure what this is about. If this is in reference to the policy page, I'm not worried about my privacy. If this is about the edits to the RationalWiki article, I didn't post my edits intending them to be set in stone. When I came back and looked at the waring over that article I wondered if you weren't defending me or maybe following that etiquette policy? I don't think you should block people over that, at least not until we write some [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|policies]] that have community support. Otherwise who is to say what is trolling, vandalism, or unwarranted blocking in a case like that? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:59, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Proxima, I forgot to say that you are welcome for my help with the debate. I don't know if it means anything to you but my "critical" comments don't change the fact that I like you. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:14, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | :Proxima, I forgot to say that you are welcome for my help with the debate. I don't know if it means anything to you but my "critical" comments don't change the fact that I like you. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:14, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:37, 31 August 2009
Thanks for helping in the debate, I'm sorry I can't stop them getting at you as well because if I try they'll say I'm using admin status in a case that involves me. Usually this is a polite wiki but it is deteriorating rapidly and unless things improve they can look for someone else to look after the wiki. Proxima Centauri 14:39, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
- I have no issue with Lumenos; I am merely pointing out that you are not being attacked by zombie computers. Phantom Hoover 15:46, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
- I should add that I like you too Phantom Hoover, even though you have apparently claimed to be "a dude" and I am critical of a number of your arguments as well. :-) Lumenos 02:37, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
- I'm not sure what this is about. If this is in reference to the policy page, I'm not worried about my privacy. If this is about the edits to the RationalWiki article, I didn't post my edits intending them to be set in stone. When I came back and looked at the waring over that article I wondered if you weren't defending me or maybe following that etiquette policy? I don't think you should block people over that, at least not until we write some policies that have community support. Otherwise who is to say what is trolling, vandalism, or unwarranted blocking in a case like that? Lumenos 15:59, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
- Proxima, I forgot to say that you are welcome for my help with the debate. I don't know if it means anything to you but my "critical" comments don't change the fact that I like you. Lumenos 17:14, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
IRC
Can we take the 3-odd discussions we are holding right now to IRC? If you're using Firefox, install ChatZilla and click on the #wikiindex link on the left; otherwise google for a client for your OS, install one, then at the IRC command line type "/server irc.freenode.net", then "/join #wikiindex". Phantom Hoover 15:23, 30 August 2009 (EDT)
- I didn't get this message until a few hours ago. I may be up for it at some point but I have got so much to do now. Lumenos 01:38, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
- For future reference I put together a list of ways to contact me either "privately" or in real-time on my Lumeniki user profile. Lumenos 01:56, 31 August 2009 (EDT)