81
edits
Talk:RationalWikiWiki: Difference between revisions
→Controversial?
(→Controversial?: does bickering count as controversy?) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::: Um, have you seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page? The "summary" lines on the history page seem to show some back-and-forth bickering. While I've seen much, much worse elsewhere, and I agree that "protecting" this article for 3 months is over-reacting, I wouldn't call it "nothing". | ::: Um, have you seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page? The "summary" lines on the history page seem to show some back-and-forth bickering. While I've seen much, much worse elsewhere, and I agree that "protecting" this article for 3 months is over-reacting, I wouldn't call it "nothing". | ||
::: p.s. about this "refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious" -- would you mind linking directly to the point where this allegedly obvious thing-pointing was refused acknowledgement? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 11:38, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::: p.s. about this "refusing to acknowledge anyone pointing out the obvious" -- would you mind linking directly to the point where this allegedly obvious thing-pointing was refused acknowledgement? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 11:38, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::: Um, yes I have seen the "history" for the RationalWikiWiki page. The only edit in three weeks was [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWikiWiki&diff=70142&oldid=69008 this one] fixing a tiny grammatical error. Not very controversial. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 12:08, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Move to article page - vote== | ==Move to article page - vote== | ||