User:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
(Finally got my wikilawyer degree, AWESOME!) |
(The old "policy development" page, which I did most of the work on can be found on me subpage.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<big><big>[http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Lumenos#How_to_contact_Lumenos How to contact me.]</big></big> | <big><big>[http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Lumenos#How_to_contact_Lumenos How to contact me.]</big></big> | ||
Lately I've been trying to establish some consensus on clear [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] here at WikiIndex [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User:Nx&oldid=71273 earning me the prestigious title of wikilawyer]. I'm not a sysop and have no special powers here other than "reason". | Lately I've been trying to establish some consensus on clear [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] here at WikiIndex [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User:Nx&oldid=71273 earning me the prestigious title of wikilawyer]. I'm not a sysop and have no special powers here other than "reason". The old "policy development" page, which I did most of the work on, can be found on [[User:Lumenos/WikiIndex policies (and drama)|me subpage]]. | ||
I am a sysop at a few wikis, including [[Lumeniki]] and [[RationalWiki]], although I have to admit the latter is just a bit of a misnomer. I would have gone with maybe "PassionateWiki" or perhaps "EmphaticWiki", but that's just me. :-) (By the way, a very active bureaucrat from RationalWiki wants you to know that, ""RationalWiki has about 3,197 registered users, of which 359 (or 11.23%) have Sysops rights, which are '''awarded very liberally by the bureaucrats.'''" from [[RationalWiki]] [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:07, 4 September 2009 (EDT)" I (Lumenos) tried to let them edit my user page here but apparently I am not able to lower the moral force field, protecting it. However | I am a sysop at a few wikis, including [[Lumeniki]] and [[RationalWiki]], although I have to admit the latter is just a bit of a misnomer. I would have gone with maybe "PassionateWiki" or perhaps "EmphaticWiki", but that's just me. :-) (By the way, a very active bureaucrat from RationalWiki wants you to know that, ""RationalWiki has about 3,197 registered users, of which 359 (or 11.23%) have Sysops rights, which are '''awarded very liberally by the bureaucrats.'''" from [[RationalWiki]] [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:07, 4 September 2009 (EDT)" I (Lumenos) tried to let them edit my user page here but apparently I am not able to lower the moral force field, protecting it. However | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 14 September 2009
Lately I've been trying to establish some consensus on clear policies here at WikiIndex earning me the prestigious title of wikilawyer. I'm not a sysop and have no special powers here other than "reason". The old "policy development" page, which I did most of the work on, can be found on me subpage.
I am a sysop at a few wikis, including Lumeniki and RationalWiki, although I have to admit the latter is just a bit of a misnomer. I would have gone with maybe "PassionateWiki" or perhaps "EmphaticWiki", but that's just me. :-) (By the way, a very active bureaucrat from RationalWiki wants you to know that, ""RationalWiki has about 3,197 registered users, of which 359 (or 11.23%) have Sysops rights, which are awarded very liberally by the bureaucrats." from RationalWiki Nx 09:07, 4 September 2009 (EDT)" I (Lumenos) tried to let them edit my user page here but apparently I am not able to lower the moral force field, protecting it. However I received permission to quote this particular bureaucrat and for that I am grateful. It might also be worth noting that the site became unavailable a few days after my arrival. A coincidence? Perhaps... and then the same thing happened at WikiSynergy.)
Lumeniki gets a little more in-depth on the serious subjects. Here is my user page at Lumeniki. Using advanced cloaking techniques, wandalism is nearly unheard of. There is just this one ***hole who keeps mixing all this weird kooky stuff in with our serious philosophy and backyard solar steam electricity generation information.
About that RationalWiki talk page
I've been reading the RationalWiki talk page, and it appears that I may have been mistaken on the Similar Wikis debate map. One thing many editors did not appreciate. However I have moved the incomplete debate maps to a subpage, so as not to cause any more confusion. Please don't let my fumbling madness there discourage you from reading the Wikipedia vs RationalWiki debate. I'm still quite proud of that one. (See you got to let them think they can win or they won't bother trying.)