1,136
edits
WikiIndex talk:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions
WikiIndex talk:Policies and Guidelines (edit)
Revision as of 02:15, 18 September 2009
, 18 September 2009Irrelevant content
(Irrelevant content) |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:While I am flattered that my comments now grace the project page, it is possible that a little more consideration might have been in order before they were unilaterally imposed.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:05, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | :While I am flattered that my comments now grace the project page, it is possible that a little more consideration might have been in order before they were unilaterally imposed.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:05, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Well, is it better than before? I don't aim for perfection, only improvement. I plan to merge in administrative comments from the original. I'm not really sure what you or Dilley want, but feel free to revert, merge, or do whatever. Any "unilateral" edit in a wiki is subject to peer review and alteration. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:03, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Well, is it better than before? I don't aim for perfection, only improvement. I plan to merge in administrative comments from the original. I'm not really sure what you or Dilley want, but feel free to revert, merge, or do whatever. Any "unilateral" edit in a wiki is subject to peer review and alteration. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:03, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Irrelevant content == | |||
"Spam and irrelevant content will be mercilessly deleted." | |||
:Since I have been critical of article protections, I've been accused of "spamming" Recent Changes, by [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk:RationalWikiWiki&diff=prev&oldid=71491 Dilley] and then [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=71588&oldid=71587 Felix]. Ordinarily I would think Felix' rules are not in reference to what I was doing, but I'm not sure, given [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=71649&oldid=71591 this (enraged?) reply]. "Assume good faith." That would be nice. But my question is about the "irrelevant" content. Are you referring to talk pages, or only articles? It sounds sorta uum.... over the top, to say we are going to '''"mercilessly"''' remove something that is merely irrelevant. It is just weird after being accused of trolling and all these things. It is kinda intimidating. Maybe it is not meant to be. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:15, 17 September 2009 (EDT) | |||