User talk:Hoof Hearted: Difference between revisions

m
→‎AboutUs: replied
m (→‎AboutUs: replied)
Line 18: Line 18:
The edit you made to [[AboutUs]] - you made as a minor edit.  Any reason that you did it that way?  Seems like a major edit to me.  Please see my response to you on the talk page.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
The edit you made to [[AboutUs]] - you made as a minor edit.  Any reason that you did it that way?  Seems like a major edit to me.  Please see my response to you on the talk page.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
: I think, to mark an edit minor was a mistake that can happen quickly in the rush, or is it per [[Special:Preferences|preferences]]? What an odd idea of the MediaWiki developers, to provide such an option! Best, [[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 12:10, 29 June 2011 (PDT)
: I think, to mark an edit minor was a mistake that can happen quickly in the rush, or is it per [[Special:Preferences|preferences]]? What an odd idea of the MediaWiki developers, to provide such an option! Best, [[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 12:10, 29 June 2011 (PDT)
Wolf has the answer ''why'' it was marked as a minor edit - my preferences are set like that, because ''most'' of my edits usually are!  And I guess I clicked the save page in haste.  But what are the 'ground rules' here for what consitutes a minor vs major edit?  Is it the amount of 'content', or the quality of the 'context'?  Because my edit on AboutUs was minor in content, but I suppose quite major in context . . . Perhaps we need to copy wikipedias policy on minor edits, and amend it accordingly to suit WikiIndex (unless it is already hiding somewhere on this site!)  And I'll head over to [[Talk:AboutUs]] and discuss further.  Kind regards, [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 12:42, 29 June 2011 (PDT)