6,456
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
→Recursive Nature of Wiki: Template:Wiki Engine
(delete procedure) |
(→Recursive Nature of Wiki: Template:Wiki Engine) |
||
| Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
* So here's another place where namespaces are useful, or could be. I believe you want everything that's currently in the main namespace to be a wiki, correct? So this page, [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]], really doesn't belong here. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the concept, but I think it goes in the WikiIndex namespace ([[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]]). Mind if I move it? Or you can. Just use the move link above. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 16:29, 18 Jan 2006 (EST) | * So here's another place where namespaces are useful, or could be. I believe you want everything that's currently in the main namespace to be a wiki, correct? So this page, [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]], really doesn't belong here. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the concept, but I think it goes in the WikiIndex namespace ([[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]]). Mind if I move it? Or you can. Just use the move link above. [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 16:29, 18 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
Actually I do mind that you move it, because it is what I mean. ;-) The idea is that I want the MediaWiki wiki to be at the top of Category MediaWiki, so that all the other media wikis are below it. does that make sense? [[John Stanton]] knows what I am trying to get at, and he is thinking of it from a programmers percpective. John, can you add anything? | Actually I do mind that you move it, because it is what I mean. ;-) The idea is that I want the MediaWiki wiki to be at the top of Category MediaWiki, so that all the other media wikis are below it. does that make sense? [[John Stanton]] knows what I am trying to get at, and he is thinking of it from a programmers percpective. John, can you add anything? | ||
| Line 272: | Line 271: | ||
On Namespace of course we want wiki's as the main types of articles, but if there's another article (like this one for example) that's in the main namespace, so long as it doesn't collide with a wiki, it think it's fine because it won't junk up the categories if we don't categorize it to anything. Am I missing something? --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 00:01, 23 Jan 2006 (EST) | On Namespace of course we want wiki's as the main types of articles, but if there's another article (like this one for example) that's in the main namespace, so long as it doesn't collide with a wiki, it think it's fine because it won't junk up the categories if we don't categorize it to anything. Am I missing something? --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 00:01, 23 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
' | For future reference, here are links to [[Template:Wiki Engine]] and [[Template:Wiki Engine boilerplate]]. Just didn't want them to get lost, in case we decide to go back to them. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:59, 11 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
== nested boxes == | == nested boxes == | ||