Template talk:Wiki size navigation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→More compact version: re) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (reply) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::::It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 18:09, 6 January 2012
More compact version
Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --Wolf | talk 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it? --Hoof Hearted 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- I think it's fixed now. What do you think? --Wolf | talk 03:55, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the list article only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at list article and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --Hoof Hearted 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link list - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button.
--Wolf | talk 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST)- It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --Hoof Hearted 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link list - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button.
- the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the list article only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at list article and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --Hoof Hearted 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- I think it's fixed now. What do you think? --Wolf | talk 03:55, 6 January 2012 (PST)