Archives: User talk:Leucosticte/Archive 1
Spam filter help
You're a wizzo on MW - can you help me with a spam filter problem please? I'm getting The following text is what triggered our spam filter: https://secure when trying to edit an article (though I thought that sysops should be able to automatically by-pass spam filters). I've tried editing our MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist, but without success. Any clues? TIA Sean, aka Hoof Hearted • Admin / 'Crat • talk2HH 12:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- My regex-fu isn't very good, unfortunately. Leucosticte (talk) 01:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Sean: Could you give the url you are adding? (without the "https://", so it won't trigger the url blacklist) --YiFei | talk 03:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- YiFei, sorry for the late reply, the (non-secure) url is http://secure.travellerspoint.com - it is for the Travellerspoint wiki.
- Yikes - even the non-https url is blocked by the spam filter —
The following text is what triggered our spam filter: http://secure– try using 'nowikii', hope I can save this edit! Thanks in advance :)))) Sean, aka Hoof Hearted • Admin / 'Crat • talk2HH 22:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)- http://secure.travellerspoint.com is now whitelisted. The problem belongs to "cure" part, but I cannot find the cause easily in MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist or meta-wiki:Spam_blacklist --YiFei | talk 14:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Article or cat?
here: WikiIndex talk:Community portal#Template:Inactive. You support the keeping of articles, but the discussion is about the keeping of category tags in articles or keeping articles about currently dead Wikis in categories. Please be precise in what You advocate.Manorainjan (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
LogoLinking
Do You have an opinion on that? Please place Your vote on this. Manorainjan (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Would You please explain precisely why You can not support Option 1 or 2?Manorainjan (talk) 12:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm just wondering about the details of implementation. Leucosticte (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Did You miss his demonstration on what the Bot is about to do? 10 test edits? Manorainjan (talk)
- Why is it not using link= Leucosticte (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Did You miss his demonstration on what the Bot is about to do? 10 test edits? Manorainjan (talk)
- Please for clarity's sake give a full example of what You mean. Manorainjan (talk)
- What if we did it like this instead? Leucosticte (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Please for clarity's sake give a full example of what You mean. Manorainjan (talk)
- This is another discussion! Like here: [[1]]
First the deviations from the common path need to be corrected. Then, after cleaning this and possibly other alterations, new features like the one You suggest, can be implemented by one run of another bot. If we would run a bot now to change the way the click on the logo would lead to, the current deviations might be exempted, creating more diversity in the way things are handled. Sooner or later bot constructions would have to handle a quite confusing amount of exemptions for the tiniest tasks.
Right now it is about how the page links to the logo file, not where the click on the logo leads to. If You call for 'endless' discussion, the linking question will be delayed and Your suggestion would rather not be dealt with at all, because after the finalising of the linking question I would not push Your idea to decision and You have to promote Your advanced cause yourself after everybody got enough of 'endless' discussions already. You may be thinking to make Your life easier by jumping on my train, but I will say You got no ticket and You will end in a place where You did not want to and would have to go back first. ;-) Manorainjan (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)