WikiIndex:Namespace conventions: Difference between revisions

→‎Examples of issues discussed: not a functional reason to have WikiIndex namespace
(→‎Examples of issues discussed: not a functional reason to have WikiIndex namespace)
Line 33: Line 33:


* It is helpful, because I know you have ideas about organization, it is just us trying to discover our (diff)! :-)  Do '''WikiIndex: Foo''' stay out of the random page generator?  Or is it that they are labeled that way, and thus more easily disinguished by the average user? [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
* It is helpful, because I know you have ideas about organization, it is just us trying to discover our (diff)! :-)  Do '''WikiIndex: Foo''' stay out of the random page generator?  Or is it that they are labeled that way, and thus more easily disinguished by the average user? [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
** We're not using the random page thing at this point, so I'd saw we should ignore that as an argument for namespaces.  My present feeling on this is the meta pages should use WikiIndex:Foo because they are internal documents of, by, and for editors of this wiki.  External documents are anything we think the average reader should be seeing.  As described above, so far we have Wikis, WikiPeople and ArticlesAboutWikiSphere in that category.  If you'd like to also have the meta pages there, obviously you can.  And since that's simpler, maybe it's even better that way.  We know template and category are useful namespaces because they have different functionality.  User talk is useful because of the notification feature.  Those are all of the namespace-related functions that I know of.  If your requirement is functionality, then I see no reason at all to use the WikiIndex namespace.  I can't really come up with anything convincing to say why we should use it for meta conversations, but I still think we should.  I will not pout if it's decide otherwise. :-) [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 15:50, 21 Jan 2006 (EST)
6,456

edits