83,675
edits
Anime Addict (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (about url, stats update, tidy) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wiki | {{Wiki | ||
|URL = http://www.rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page | |||
|URL=http://www.rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page | |logo = http://rationalwiki.org/w/images/6/6e/Rw_logo.png | ||
|logo=http://rationalwiki.org/w/images/6/6e/Rw_logo.png | |recentchanges URL= http://www.rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Recentchanges | ||
|recentchanges URL=http://www.rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Recentchanges | |wikinode URL = http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Wikinode | ||
|wikinode URL=http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Wikinode | |about URL = http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki | ||
|status=Vibrant | |status = Vibrant | ||
|language=Multilingual | |language = Multilingual | ||
|editmode=OpenEdit | |editmode = OpenEdit | ||
|engine=MediaWiki | |engine = MediaWiki | ||
|maintopic=Pseudoscience | |maintopic = Pseudoscience | ||
|license=Creative Commons Attribution | |license = Creative Commons Attribution | ||
|backupurl=http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Content_dumps | |backupurl = http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Content_dumps | ||
}} | }}{{TOCright}} | ||
'''RationalWiki''' is an open wiki taking a critical look at the pseudoscience movement and extremist politics, through the use of side-by-side examinations and humor. | '''RationalWiki''' is an open [[wiki]] taking a {{tag|Criticism|critical}} look at the {{tag|pseudoscience}} movement and extremist {{tag|politics}}, through the use of side-by-side examinations and {{tag|humor}}. | ||
Stated goals are: | Stated goals are: | ||
* Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people. | *Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people. | ||
* Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas. | *Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas. | ||
* Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. | *Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. | ||
* Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media. | *Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media. | ||
RationalWiki has about 4,723 registered accounts, of which 565 (or 12%) have [[ | RationalWiki has about 4,723 registered accounts, of which 565 (or 12%) have [[sysop]] rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s. | ||
RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as: up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy Bible quotations. | RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as: up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy {{tag|Bible}} quotations. | ||
RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]]. | RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]]. | ||
{{Size | {{Size <!--see Template:Size for full detail--> | ||
| statistics URL = http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/ | |pages= 6264 <!--type the plain number of pages - NO thousands separators--> | ||
|statistics URL= http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Statistics | |||
| wikiFactor = 53 | |wikiFactor= <!--53 preferred, if unknown leave void, see: Category:wikiFactor--> | ||
| wikiFactor URL = http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:PopularPages | |wikiFactor URL= http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:PopularPages | ||
}} | }}(As of: 07 April 2013)<!--manually add/amend date when stats are verified and/or updated--> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
RationalWiki started in {{tag|FoundedIn2007|May 2007}} after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at | RationalWiki started in {{tag|FoundedIn2007|May 2007}} after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. | ||
==RationalWiki today== | ==RationalWiki today== | ||
While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki ( | While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F What is going on at Conservapedia?] page), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded {{tag|medical}} claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly pro-{{tag|Atheism|atheist}}, anti-{{tag|Religion|religious}} stance, some editors are practicing Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. However, most of the regular contributers to RationalWiki are devout atheists. | ||
The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, {{tag|Christianity}}, {{tag|Creationism}}, {{tag|Astrology}}, "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (see [[RationalWiki:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge| RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]]). | The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, {{tag|Christianity}}, {{tag|Creationism}}, {{tag|Astrology}}, "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (see [[RationalWiki:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge|RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]]). | ||
The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. | The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. | ||
RationalWiki has one or two | RationalWiki has one or two {{tag|GreatFeature|great features}} - readers can vote on their "what Is Going On" pages; there are random text generators for entertainment purposes - usually for parodying various figures at Conservapedia. | ||
Example of RationalWiki's perspective:- | Example of RationalWiki's perspective:- | ||
< | <blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article]''</blockquote> | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Former [[Conservapedia]] sysop and [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127] | |||
Many of those critical of RationalWiki refer to the website as "RatWiki" or "IrrationalWiki. | Many of those critical of RationalWiki refer to the website as "RatWiki" or "IrrationalWiki". [[Libertapedia]] has a [http://libertapedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki page critical of RW] referring to it as "IrrationaWiki". | ||
[[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] was as critical of RationalWiki as it was of most other things. | [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] was as critical of RationalWiki as it was of most other things. | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==Satire== | ==Satire== | ||
Satirical | Satirical articles on RationalWiki appear [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/RationalWiki here in] [[Uncyclopedia]] and [http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/RationalWiki here] in [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]. Uncyclopedia has a [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/HowTo:Play_RationalTroll page encouraging readers to vandalize the wiki]. | ||
==RationalWiki Foundation== | ==RationalWiki Foundation== | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki. | *[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki. | ||
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content. | *[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content. | ||
*[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki | *[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki | ||
==Similar wikis== | ==Similar wikis== | ||
*[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles. | |||
[[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | [[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] |
edits