WikiIndex:2013-2014 bugs and upgrades: Difference between revisions

== Technology via the community == This isn't the right section title, but what I am trying to get across is - what technology does the community a) need to have access to, to make WikiIndex even better. b) who here has skills / time / interest to
(→‎Bugs: ### Do we know what might be the issue here with the email issue?)
(== Technology via the community == This isn't the right section title, but what I am trying to get across is - what technology does the community a) need to have access to, to make WikiIndex even better. b) who here has skills / time / interest to)
Line 199: Line 199:
|style="overflow-x:scroll; overflow-y:hidden"}}
|style="overflow-x:scroll; overflow-y:hidden"}}


==On the back-burner==
== On the back-burner ==
This sub-section can be used making suggestions for beta extensions, ie, those we might like to add at a later date once they've evolved into a stable extension
This sub-section can be used making suggestions for beta extensions, ie, those we might like to add at a later date once they've evolved into a stable extension
# <s>[[mw:Extension:MassEditRegex]]</s> — ''Pro:'' can be used by Sysops for 'bot'-like edits, without the need for creating bot scripts - ''Con:'' still in beta phase
# <s>[[mw:Extension:MassEditRegex]]</s> — ''Pro:'' can be used by Sysops for 'bot'-like edits, without the need for creating bot scripts - ''Con:'' still in beta phase
Line 205: Line 205:
## I can vouch for this. I've used the MassEditRegex extension on my own wiki repeatedly and it has proven quite stable and does what it is intended to do. I highly recommend it. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 12:43, 25 January 2013 (PST)Arcane
## I can vouch for this. I've used the MassEditRegex extension on my own wiki repeatedly and it has proven quite stable and does what it is intended to do. I highly recommend it. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 12:43, 25 January 2013 (PST)Arcane
## Issue is we don't have a dedicated back end developer to work on WikiIndex, know anyone who can? :-)  So I say strike out for now.
## Issue is we don't have a dedicated back end developer to work on WikiIndex, know anyone who can? :-)  So I say strike out for now.
== Technology via the community ==
This isn't the right section title, but what I am trying to get across is - what technology does the community a) need to have access to, to make WikiIndex even better.  b) who here has skills / time / interest to do the backend work needed?


[[Category:WikiIndex]]
[[Category:WikiIndex]]
[[Category:Admin]]
[[Category:Admin]]
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,138

edits