83,675
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive1: Difference between revisions
m
minor tidy following changes in {{TalkPageArchive}}
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m ({{TalkPageArchive}} {{TOCright}}) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (minor tidy following changes in {{TalkPageArchive}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TalkPageArchive | {{TalkPageArchive}} | ||
[[RationalWiki]] is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | [[RationalWiki]] is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:Yes, lil' Debbie got me to register here. Who says nothing good comes of Conservapedia? --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 16:55, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | :Yes, lil' Debbie got me to register here. Who says nothing good comes of Conservapedia? --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 16:55, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
== The "criticism" section == | ==The "criticism" section== | ||
I have taken out the claim | I have taken out the claim | ||
*Many users at [[RationalWiki]] will remove factual material, even if backed up by sources ... | *Many users at [[RationalWiki]] will remove factual material, even if backed up by sources ... | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Anyone care to substantiate any of the criticisms in that section? [[User:24.36.227.74|24.36.227.74]] 21:55, 25 August 2008 (EDT) | Anyone care to substantiate any of the criticisms in that section? [[User:24.36.227.74|24.36.227.74]] 21:55, 25 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Gibberish == | ==Gibberish== | ||
The source for the “Gibberish” is likely to be editors of [[Conservapedia]]. Conservapedia has a reputation for being biased and inaccurate. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 00:11, 26 August 2008 (EDT) | The source for the “Gibberish” is likely to be editors of [[Conservapedia]]. Conservapedia has a reputation for being biased and inaccurate. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 00:11, 26 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Hell! == | ==Hell!== | ||
Even the criticism section of this wiki is just a rant against Conservapedia! Dont like Conservapedia? Fine! Just ignore it! Get a life! Come on![[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 07:26, 19 November 2008 (EST). | Even the criticism section of this wiki is just a rant against Conservapedia! Dont like Conservapedia? Fine! Just ignore it! Get a life! Come on![[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 07:26, 19 November 2008 (EST). | ||
:I think it's becoming pretty clear what Proxima's motives are here. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:24, 19 November 2008 (EST) | :I think it's becoming pretty clear what Proxima's motives are here. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:24, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::Warning people away from the intellectual plague-pit that is Conservapedia? Sounds good to me. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 03:27, 28 November 2008 (EST) | ::Warning people away from the intellectual plague-pit that is Conservapedia? Sounds good to me. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 03:27, 28 November 2008 (EST) | ||
== Wikiindex == | ==Wikiindex== | ||
I have been asked[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidCary&diff=59927&oldid=59646] how much criticism is appropriate in the this [[RationalWiki]] article. | I have been asked[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidCary&diff=59927&oldid=59646] how much criticism is appropriate in the this [[RationalWiki]] article. | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
More discussion at [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Conservapedia, RationalWiki etc]]. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 09:42, 24 November 2008 (EST) | More discussion at [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Conservapedia, RationalWiki etc]]. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 09:42, 24 November 2008 (EST) | ||
== "Cyberbullying" section == | =="Cyberbullying" section== | ||
Surely [[WikiIndex]] editors should not use article space and admin abilities to pursue grudges about incidents at other [[wiki]]s. I have requested administration on this issue [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki&diff=next&oldid=66868 here.] [[User:213.106.29.88|213.106.29.88]] 09:16, 28 June 2009 (EDT) | Surely [[WikiIndex]] editors should not use article space and admin abilities to pursue grudges about incidents at other [[wiki]]s. I have requested administration on this issue [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki&diff=next&oldid=66868 here.] [[User:213.106.29.88|213.106.29.88]] 09:16, 28 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
::To be fair, he can't acrue evidence while the site is down. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:49, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ::To be fair, he can't acrue evidence while the site is down. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:49, 29 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Why the page "RationalWiki" was protected == | ==Why the page "RationalWiki" was protected== | ||
: ''In some Moslim if it comes out that a person isan atheist that can mean a death sentence, therfore users need a warning that their privacy isn't safe at RationalWiki.''[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=protect&user=&page=RationalWiki] | : ''In some Moslim if it comes out that a person isan atheist that can mean a death sentence, therfore users need a warning that their privacy isn't safe at RationalWiki.''[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=protect&user=&page=RationalWiki] | ||
I have never seen such an incoherent edit comment, from an admin, or anyone, for that matter. Admin abuse procedures will proceed. PC is pursuing a personal vendetta and using admin powers to protect her edits. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:47, 2 July 2009 (EDT) | I have never seen such an incoherent edit comment, from an admin, or anyone, for that matter. Admin abuse procedures will proceed. PC is pursuing a personal vendetta and using admin powers to protect her edits. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:47, 2 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
::::::::To that end, I see that you've taken your complaint to the right place: [[Mark Dilley]]. I'd wait for a response from him before engaging in more tit for tat. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:17, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::To that end, I see that you've taken your complaint to the right place: [[Mark Dilley]]. I'd wait for a response from him before engaging in more tit for tat. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:17, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
(UI) Thank you, and I see the ridiculous comment is no longer in this article. The magical wiki process must have worked! That is one of the fundamental principles at RW - that people who care will find the best solution/outcome. Glad to see it working here as well. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:34, 12 July 2009 (EDT) | (UI) Thank you, and I see the ridiculous comment is no longer in this article. The magical wiki process must have worked! That is one of the fundamental principles at RW - that people who care will find the best solution/outcome. Glad to see it working here as well. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 06:34, 12 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::If Proxima Centauri is so concerned about her real identity being exposed as an atheist, why on earth does her [ | ::::::::If Proxima Centauri is so concerned about her real identity being exposed as an atheist, why on earth does her [[wp:User:Barbara Shack|Wikipedia user page]] boast of the fact? [[User:205.212.79.99|205.212.79.99]] 14:28, 24 August 2009 (EDT) | ||