1,756
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
→Danish-German Neonazi
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:::I vouch for him as being unlikely to be a pedophile, but also as deliberately creating high conflict and controversy. He is normally cooperative as an editor, if given clear boundaries. as I mentioned, he did not intend harm in editing your user page. He will push certain kinds of boundaries, as might be common with people with, say, Attention Deficit Disorder. If it is not explicitly prohibited, he may assume it is allowed. | :::I vouch for him as being unlikely to be a pedophile, but also as deliberately creating high conflict and controversy. He is normally cooperative as an editor, if given clear boundaries. as I mentioned, he did not intend harm in editing your user page. He will push certain kinds of boundaries, as might be common with people with, say, Attention Deficit Disorder. If it is not explicitly prohibited, he may assume it is allowed. | ||
:::However, he can also be strangely compliant, when someone else might not be. There is a wiki where he was "banned," for a time, and is blocked (by the unilateral action of a single administrator) but he still has, as of this date, administrator privileges there, and could unblock himself. He hasn't. See, on Wikipedia, it's prohibited for an administrator to unblock himself. So he follows that rule. Yes, he might be desysopped if he unblocks himself. Or not. It depends on how funny it is. If it's really funny, he might not be desysopped, or he might be quickly resysopped if he is. Or not. It's a wiki, which, translated into English, means "unpredictable." --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 19:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC) | :::However, he can also be strangely compliant, when someone else might not be. There is a wiki where he was "banned," for a time, and is blocked (by the unilateral action of a single administrator) but he still has, as of this date, administrator privileges there, and could unblock himself. He hasn't. See, on Wikipedia, it's prohibited for an administrator to unblock himself. So he follows that rule. Yes, he might be desysopped if he unblocks himself. Or not. It depends on how funny it is. If it's really funny, he might not be desysopped, or he might be quickly resysopped if he is. Or not. It's a wiki, which, translated into English, means "unpredictable." --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 19:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::I was reportedly given a "[https://sites.google.com/a/iconopsych.com/psychlopedia-com/rule-out rule-out diagnosis]" of pedophilia, although I wasn't allowed to actually see the report; as you know, that matter is in litigation. A rule-out diagnosis is an informal diagnostic label that means "the client meets many of the symptoms but not enough to make a diagnosis at this time; it should be considered further." The use of rule-out diagnoses is not endorsed by the DSM-5 and is sometimes even considered bad practice. | |||
::::Isn't it [[wikipedia:Censorship_in_the_Federal_Republic_of_Germany#National_Socialist_parties|against the law]] for people to go around endorsing Nazism in Germany? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Trolls == | == Trolls == | ||