5,924
edits
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Please check for SPAM: re) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Please check for SPAM: persuasion) |
||
Line 451: | Line 451: | ||
: You want to argue on grounds of WP policies? Great! Than let us continue this little argument where it belongs: [[WikiIndex_talk:Community_portal#Who_cares_what_rules_Wikipedia_supposedly_follows.3F|Who cares what rules Wikipedia supposedly follows?]] | : You want to argue on grounds of WP policies? Great! Than let us continue this little argument where it belongs: [[WikiIndex_talk:Community_portal#Who_cares_what_rules_Wikipedia_supposedly_follows.3F|Who cares what rules Wikipedia supposedly follows?]] | ||
::It's kind of like, if you're arguing a case in a U.S. Court of Appeals, mentioning how other circuits ruled on the issue. Those decisions aren't binding on the court that will be ruling in your case, but they could be persuasive. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 13:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC) | ::It's kind of like, if you're arguing a case in a U.S. Court of Appeals, mentioning how other circuits ruled on the issue. Those decisions aren't binding on the court that will be ruling in your case, but they could be persuasive. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 13:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Haha, that's so funny that You use the word persuasive ;-) I just thought of that in [[User_talk:Leucosticte#Deletion_requests|my reply on Your talk page]] [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 13:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC) |
edits