5,924
edits
User talk:Koavf: Difference between revisions
→MeatballWiki: I like the idea of fostering community between wikis and the larger movement for free and open culture??
No edit summary |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→MeatballWiki: I like the idea of fostering community between wikis and the larger movement for free and open culture??) |
||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
Yes, You did not create that page. But You assigned it <nowiki>{{WikiStatus}}</nowiki> and made it member of [[:Category:Wiki Status]] which has the same effect as creating a new WikiStatus. You added another Status to WikiStatus. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 19:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | Yes, You did not create that page. But You assigned it <nowiki>{{WikiStatus}}</nowiki> and made it member of [[:Category:Wiki Status]] which has the same effect as creating a new WikiStatus. You added another Status to WikiStatus. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 19:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:'''Status''' It already ''was'' a status of a sort: it just wasn't categorized as one. As long as it exists, it should be categorized properly for navigation. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 19:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | :'''Status''' It already ''was'' a status of a sort: it just wasn't categorized as one. As long as it exists, it should be categorized properly for navigation. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 19:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
2010 this category was created without asking anybody or even trying to introduce it to the community or giving it a definition and only for the purpose to mark a very limited set of 8 wikis of the WikiMedia foundation. This was already a mistake. It was ignoring the requirements of well functioning database and ignoring the community of this wiki. You did not correct this mistake, You engraved it. The definition which You created aligned the use on [[MeatballWiki]] and ignored the original use for which it was created. So You created more confusion and contradiction. And now You are doing Your very best to defend that rather than trying to understand that it should be coordinated with the rest of us. You also made no attempt at all to introduce Your change to the community. On 17 October 2013 You assigned the not defined status Locked and did not care that it was no member of WikiStatus. In August we had this discussion [[Category talk:Wiki Status]] which You took part in shortly about another aspect. You know pretty well that it was not finalised. You also did not contribute in a fashion to finalize it, did not make a suggestion that could have helped to solve the puzzle. You saw my Invitation2Invitations which is pointing to this unfinished discussion and actively went on to ignore this discussion for doing YOUR own thing in spite of it. If I would do such things and mess up WikiStatus matters just according to my discretion I think I would get blocked again. Your mission statement "I like the idea of fostering community between wikis and the larger movement for free and open culture..." is not reflected in Your edits here. Or should that be translated as: "I like the idea but will not actively contribute to it." ? | |||