5,924
edits
Zhuyifei1999 (talk | contribs) (→to be blocked: repeated vandalism?) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→to be blocked: make him show flag so You can talk to him) |
||
Line 581: | Line 581: | ||
OK, what about semiprotection of pages where those kind of incidents happened? Thing is, You can not talk to that IP-editor and tell him what not to do. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 11:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | OK, what about semiprotection of pages where those kind of incidents happened? Thing is, You can not talk to that IP-editor and tell him what not to do. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 11:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I don't see repeated vandalism. Or am I wrong? --[[YiFei]] | <small>[[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|talk]]</small> 11:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | :I don't see repeated vandalism. Or am I wrong? --[[YiFei]] | <small>[[User talk:Zhuyifei1999|talk]]</small> 11:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
It is one of the pages "Sweetie against the rest of the world" ;-) But this is not my point. If any IP-editor forces any sysop to make a little jump (delete-undelete), than measures should be taken to prevent further hiccups. Since you can not talk to an IP-editor, by semi-protecting the page the IP-editor would be forced to show flag, if he wishes to continue this. Also this wiki is only a bliki. So not really anybody else but the bliki owner would be affected. | |||
== [[User:MissingLink]] == | == [[User:MissingLink]] == |
edits