User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions

1,313 bytes added ,  24 December 2014
→‎Two concerns: new section
(→‎Wiki people: new section)
(→‎Two concerns: new section)
Line 180: Line 180:


Perhaps you'd care to weigh in on [[WikiIndex_talk:Community_portal#Criteria_for_Wiki_People_pages|this discussion]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps you'd care to weigh in on [[WikiIndex_talk:Community_portal#Criteria_for_Wiki_People_pages|this discussion]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
== Two concerns ==
So, Koavf is concerned about WikiIndex being used to promote users and wikis, while you're concerned about WikiIndex being used to denigrate users and wikis. [[MarvelZuvembie]] was saying, "Wiki People pages were originally generated by the people themselves. I think it should stay that way. That's my criteria" while it seemed like Koavf's concern was that if people created pages on themselves, they would tend to be self-promotional.
Basically, it sounds like the only people who can create anything here are those who have no agenda, but why would such people bother? People usually create content about stuff they're interested in, whether because they have a strong like or dislike for it. It's kinda similar to how survey results tend to be biased either extremely positively or extremely negatively, because the only people who bother to fill out surveys are usually customers who are either extremely pleased or displeased with a company's product.
There was never really a policy created on what point of view WikiIndex pages are supposed to have. Are they supposed to be neutral, like Wikipedia? Sympathetic, like Wikinfo? Hostile, like Encyclopedia Dramatica? It's anyone's guess. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 23:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1,756

edits