331
edits
User talk:Leucosticte: Difference between revisions
→Consider this a friendly warning: bad idea to try to argue with an admin warning you. however, won't be the first time. Remember that image of a finger?
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
(→Consider this a friendly warning: bad idea to try to argue with an admin warning you. however, won't be the first time. Remember that image of a finger?) |
||
| Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
While I cannot speak for the other administrators, for myself I'm all for promoting harmony on any wiki I administrate, and if you continue to disrupt that harmony, you may have to be blocked for a time, the length depending on the level of disruption you continue to display. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 22:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | While I cannot speak for the other administrators, for myself I'm all for promoting harmony on any wiki I administrate, and if you continue to disrupt that harmony, you may have to be blocked for a time, the length depending on the level of disruption you continue to display. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 22:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I don't know if I'd call it edit warring; more like being part of the [[BRD cycle]]. Definitely I didn't do anything that would be akin to a 3RR violation. I encourage you not to overreact; there's not really a lot of disharmony going on right now on the wiki, just healthy debate. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | :I don't know if I'd call it edit warring; more like being part of the [[BRD cycle]]. Definitely I didn't do anything that would be akin to a 3RR violation. I encourage you not to overreact; there's not really a lot of disharmony going on right now on the wiki, just healthy debate. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::Nobody said it was 3RR. It was not, however, BRD. He has not over-reacted. As to "healthy debate," Nathan, you call all debate "healthy." But the purpose of the wiki is *not* debate. The purpose does require, at times, discussion, which can become debate, i.e., two sides, each arguing strenuously that they are right. | |||
::BRD: Bold action, Reverted, so Discuss. On the proposed policy, you took bold action, too bold. You labelled a proposed policy a "policy." That was coming out of your consistent WP:POINT violations. I reverted, started discussion, and you reverted back. On our equivalent to a noticeboard, there was a disruptive request that you be banned, from an IP editor. You responded, because you love fracas. I removed that, because if you are going to be banned, it should not be at the prompting of an IP troll or lunatic. I don't think it's necessary to ban you, and Arcane has not suggested it. So, following some basic principles, I removed the discussion. You reverted. That could be interpreted as BRD. However, you did not discuss. (I.e., my removal was Bold, you Reverted). --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 14:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | |||