331
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
→Sea lion: say what you like, don't threaten their pups
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
(→Sea lion: say what you like, don't threaten their pups) |
||
| Line 305: | Line 305: | ||
:::Q.E.D. Cartoon character woman makes an off-hand comment about what she "could do without," i.e, sea lions, and is then harassed by a sea lion forever, demanding she explain herself. Then, the ****tards at [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] end the introduction by claiming that "The comic ends with the man claiming the reason sea lions are so despicable is because they use this pesky thing called logic." They lie, which is no surprise on ED at all. There is no claim that sea lions are despicable. There is no logic behind the supposed "sea lion" position, it is pure self-interest and demand. Basically, Nathan is a sea lion, in this metaphor. He demands that the world explain and justify its existence. He does not actually intrude into people's houses and lives like the cartoon sea lion, but it's plain he'd like to. He believes that it is about logic. He's radically deluded, lost in his self-centered vision of life. Until and unless he gets it, wakes up, realizes what he has been doing, probably since he was a child. Meanwhile, there is always fish. Sea lions get to eat lots of fish. Raw, the tasty way. Don't mess with sea lions. Fortunately, perhaps, they don't care what you say, they are much bigger than that, they are not offended by mere words. Just don't touch their fish. Don't even *think* about touching their fish. Logic has nothing to do with it. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | :::Q.E.D. Cartoon character woman makes an off-hand comment about what she "could do without," i.e, sea lions, and is then harassed by a sea lion forever, demanding she explain herself. Then, the ****tards at [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] end the introduction by claiming that "The comic ends with the man claiming the reason sea lions are so despicable is because they use this pesky thing called logic." They lie, which is no surprise on ED at all. There is no claim that sea lions are despicable. There is no logic behind the supposed "sea lion" position, it is pure self-interest and demand. Basically, Nathan is a sea lion, in this metaphor. He demands that the world explain and justify its existence. He does not actually intrude into people's houses and lives like the cartoon sea lion, but it's plain he'd like to. He believes that it is about logic. He's radically deluded, lost in his self-centered vision of life. Until and unless he gets it, wakes up, realizes what he has been doing, probably since he was a child. Meanwhile, there is always fish. Sea lions get to eat lots of fish. Raw, the tasty way. Don't mess with sea lions. Fortunately, perhaps, they don't care what you say, they are much bigger than that, they are not offended by mere words. Just don't touch their fish. Don't even *think* about touching their fish. Logic has nothing to do with it. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::She could've just answered the sea lion satisfactorily and it would've gone away. But nooooooo... Actually, if the SJWs had been the sea lion, they would've launched ''ad hominem'' attacks against the woman, accusing her of being hateful, intolerant, etc. The SJWs are even worse than the sea lions they criticize. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 06:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::She could've just answered the sea lion satisfactorily and it would've gone away. But nooooooo... Actually, if the SJWs had been the sea lion, they would've launched ''ad hominem'' attacks against the woman, accusing her of being hateful, intolerant, etc. The SJWs are even worse than the sea lions they criticize. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 06:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::Satisfactorily according to whom? Who are these SJWs? I'm seeing an entire fantasy world, a caricature of reality, not reality, and a series of fantasy people, each of whom thinks the next is even worse. This is the sea lion I imagine, from the cartoon: it will never go away, until and unless the woman agrees completely with it. Real sea lions are far easier to satisfy. Say what you like, just don't touch their fish. Or threaten their pups. Or even ''look like'' you are threatening their pups. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 14:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||