5,924
edits
User talk:Koavf: Difference between revisions
→Shoot first, ask later?: case closed
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) m (→Shoot first, ask later?: ftfy) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Shoot first, ask later?: case closed) |
||
| Line 344: | Line 344: | ||
::You are getting it wrong on purpose to evade the argument I actually made. Bad move! Shall I add stubborn and malevolent to the list? I did in no way altogether compare You and me regarding being invited to his user page. If You had done the same thing as I did, just from Your perspective, that You assume his first language is French, and if You therefore added <nowiki>{{language|fr|N}}</nowiki>to his user page, I would have let it be and trusted Y. to set it right if he sees reason to do so even if You would have not supplied "Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[:Category:FrenchSpeakers]] and [[:Category:Language]]" in the summary field. I do not see that anybody was "invited" to his user page and therefore anybody who edits it is kind of trespassing. For this reason I'm always adding the comment to make clear it is up to the (mostly new) user, he/she is free to edit it. You can see from this, if You got eyes to see, that I'm not rude there, I'm educative and attentive.[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 14:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ::You are getting it wrong on purpose to evade the argument I actually made. Bad move! Shall I add stubborn and malevolent to the list? I did in no way altogether compare You and me regarding being invited to his user page. If You had done the same thing as I did, just from Your perspective, that You assume his first language is French, and if You therefore added <nowiki>{{language|fr|N}}</nowiki>to his user page, I would have let it be and trusted Y. to set it right if he sees reason to do so even if You would have not supplied "Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[:Category:FrenchSpeakers]] and [[:Category:Language]]" in the summary field. I do not see that anybody was "invited" to his user page and therefore anybody who edits it is kind of trespassing. For this reason I'm always adding the comment to make clear it is up to the (mostly new) user, he/she is free to edit it. You can see from this, if You got eyes to see, that I'm not rude there, I'm educative and attentive.[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 14:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::'''Wrong''' I'm not getting it wrong on purpose: I just have no idea what you're talking about. Yann ''isn't'' a new user and ''has'' used #babel before. He can edit his userpage just fine so I don't know why anyone else feels the need to edit it for him. Welcoming a new user is one thing but this is another: it's pointless. I didn't claim you were rude for this action (but I have before for several others and stand behind it)--I don't think it's rude; I think it's confusing and unnecessary. I'll let him decide if he wants to apply #babel to his userpage and I don't see why we should fight over it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 18:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | :::'''Wrong''' I'm not getting it wrong on purpose: I just have no idea what you're talking about. Yann ''isn't'' a new user and ''has'' used #babel before. He can edit his userpage just fine so I don't know why anyone else feels the need to edit it for him. Welcoming a new user is one thing but this is another: it's pointless. I didn't claim you were rude for this action (but I have before for several others and stand behind it)--I don't think it's rude; I think it's confusing and unnecessary. I'll let him decide if he wants to apply #babel to his userpage and I don't see why we should fight over it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 18:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::'''Also''' As a point of order, I'm not ''assuming'' anything about the languages he understands: he points them out himself. If you had made a click or two, you would know. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 18:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | :::'''Also''' As a point of order, I'm not ''assuming'' anything about the languages he understands: he points them out himself. If you had made a click or two, you would know. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 18:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
For a man who has no idea what I'm talking about You are quite unerringly evading that point I'm making. From this I can safely assume that You understood very well but are reluctant to admit that You are at fault. Did You really think You could fool me like that? No need to answer, the question was rhetorically. And no need for me to continue this, because I saw You got the point even though that would no mean You would be able to learn from that. But that's Your problem not mine. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 08:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | |||