1,756
edits
User talk:Manorainjan: Difference between revisions
→Invitation or nastigram?: re
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Invitation or nastigram?: or?) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
Leucosticte is correct. Neither did I invite You [This wiki in itself was always invitation enough] nor did I want to chase You away. I was just pointing out inconsistency. You registered here 2006 and than did exactly nothing at all until 2014. So why the talk about "awesome community" of which You obviously do not know a thing? I would prefer You would cut out the compensative smarming and stay with the facts. How did You get the idea I could possibly like to chase You away? What would be my advantage in such a case in Your eyes? I do not regard invitation and nastigramm as opposites or even contradictions. In a way most nastigramm are invitations to get going ;-) [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 03:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | Leucosticte is correct. Neither did I invite You [This wiki in itself was always invitation enough] nor did I want to chase You away. I was just pointing out inconsistency. You registered here 2006 and than did exactly nothing at all until 2014. So why the talk about "awesome community" of which You obviously do not know a thing? I would prefer You would cut out the compensative smarming and stay with the facts. How did You get the idea I could possibly like to chase You away? What would be my advantage in such a case in Your eyes? I do not regard invitation and nastigramm as opposites or even contradictions. In a way most nastigramm are invitations to get going ;-) [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 03:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I wouldn't really say "invitations"; more like pressure that's likely counterproductive. My current fiancée (the successor of the person-who-shall-not-be-named-here) uses the opposite approach. She'll make a suggestion, but never in a way that suggests I'm wrong about something; in fact she'll say the opposite (e.g. "I won't contradict") which makes it evident she disagrees, but subtly, indirectly, and non-confrontationally, so that it's up to me to ask what she thinks if I want to know. Or if an issue doesn't matter much, she'll [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CK3a-vhBV0&t=6m23s just ignore it], rather than point out just for the heck of it that she disagrees. Plus she maintains a [http://www.gottmancouplesretreats.com/about/relationships-dysfunctional-divorce-predictors.aspx high ratio of positive to negative interactions]. You're the most confrontational person I've ever known who hasn't yet been kicked off the wiki, which just goes to show how tolerant this place is. Even I haven't been blocked from it yet. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | |||