User:Manorainjan/Titles: Difference between revisions

Line 33: Line 33:


==So what ==
==So what ==
will I do?
Of course one can always plaster ones concerns at the bottom of the talk page no matter what was written earlier, no matter if that was a personal talk page or at project space. Thoughtlessness is the rule of the century. Why deviate from it? Is it not even better to stack it upon the pile so that it is noticed immediately, because what could be more important than ones current sensitivities?
Unfortunately I got acquainted with the law of KARMA. That where robbing me of the comforting illusion that one can successfully dump ones work before the feet of others without ever bearing the consequences. But still I'm quite lazy! Therefore I got careful at least not to 'create' work, because all work 'created' by me will have to come back to me through all my future incarnations until I really worked it out.
So I'm applying a happy mix of lazy naivety and systematic house cleaning: I go through the index of topics to see if 'my' topic was addressed already. I take seemingly meaningful titles for real, read their content when they apply and ignore their content when not. And all pseudo-titles, which I encounter on my way down the index, until I find a fitting topic, I turn into true titles that serve at least the purpose of showing clearly if they match my topic or not. That means, as soon as I found a topic where I can jump in, I stop correcting any section titles below that, at least until my next visit of that page.
Now, should one act this way? The Golden Rule applies as usual: I would appreciate if people would create meaningful titles on my talk page or even turn pseudo-titles into real ones if I hadn't done so already ;-)
5,924

edits