Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:Sean Fennel: Difference between revisions
Fix red link
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix double-redirect) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix red link) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:::This is copied from MediaWiki.org: | :::This is copied from MediaWiki.org: | ||
<blockquote>IMPORTANT: Running a 1.3 or 1.4 wiki and don't want to jump to 1.5 yet? Be sure to upgrade to 1.3.17 or 1.4.11, also released today. Versions prior to 1.3.16 and 1.4.10 have a serious data corruption bug which is triggered by a spambot known to operate in the wild.</blockquote> | <blockquote>IMPORTANT: Running a 1.3 or 1.4 wiki and don't want to jump to 1.5 yet? Be sure to upgrade to 1.3.17 or 1.4.11, also released today. Versions prior to 1.3.16 and 1.4.10 have a serious data corruption bug which is triggered by a spambot known to operate in the wild.</blockquote> | ||
:Note that they're on 1.4.1'''5''' currently. 1.4.13 added protection against WMF vulnerability attacks, and 1.4.15 renders more accurately in the IE7 beta. Oh, and 1.6 also introduces {{ | :Note that they're on 1.4.1'''5''' currently. 1.4.13 added protection against WMF vulnerability attacks, and 1.4.15 renders more accurately in the IE7 beta. Oh, and 1.6 also introduces {{Wp|CAPTCHA}} support. You could do it before, but it took a lot more work in 1.5 than before. So in summary, Yeah, it's worth pushing for. —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">@</span>]] 20:35, 11 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
::Okay, I put in a plug [http://www.WikiIndex.org/User_talk:John_Stanton#upgrading here]. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:12, 12 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ::Okay, I put in a plug [http://www.WikiIndex.org/User_talk:John_Stanton#upgrading here]. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:12, 12 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[Talk:HughPage]] | [[Talk:HughPage]] | ||
Ah, I see you already figured this out and fixed it for [[2kom.org | Ah, I see you already figured this out and fixed it for [[2kom.org]]. How do you get that actual path? Is this bot work we're seeing or manual? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:00, 4 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Still me. I get the path of the actual image by viewing the image page and copying the url of the link directly under it from the right click menu. Not a bot yet. For the Pywikibot I'd have to write a custom script for it, and as I'm not a programmer I can't do that. What I will use is the Auto Wiki Browser which means I'll still be doing it manually, but it'll still be a lot faster than doing it without. —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">@</span>]] 15:51, 4 July 2006 (EDT) | :Still me. I get the path of the actual image by viewing the image page and copying the url of the link directly under it from the right click menu. Not a bot yet. For the Pywikibot I'd have to write a custom script for it, and as I'm not a programmer I can't do that. What I will use is the Auto Wiki Browser which means I'll still be doing it manually, but it'll still be a lot faster than doing it without. —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC, Times New Roman">@</span>]] 15:51, 4 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
Thanks! Got it now. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:12, 7 November 2006 (EST) | Thanks! Got it now. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:12, 7 November 2006 (EST) | ||
When you ask ''"Is it documented anywhere...?"'', I suspect you are looking for the friendly tutorial at {{ | When you ask ''"Is it documented anywhere...?"'', I suspect you are looking for the friendly tutorial at {{Wp|Wikipedia:Picture tutorial}}. There's also far more detailed documentation at {{Wp|Wikipedia:Extended image syntax}} and [[mw:Help:Images|MediaWiki:Help:Images]]. | ||
Those pages document the "image width syntax", which starts with "<tt><nowiki>[[Image:...</nowiki></tt>" and -- if necessary -- ends with something like "<tt><nowiki>...|150px]]</nowiki></tt>" to set the desired size, as alluded to by [[User:Sean Fennel]] above. Should [[WikiProject:Logos]] mention the image width syntax? | Those pages document the "image width syntax", which starts with "<tt><nowiki>[[Image:...</nowiki></tt>" and -- if necessary -- ends with something like "<tt><nowiki>...|150px]]</nowiki></tt>" to set the desired size, as alluded to by [[User:Sean Fennel]] above. Should [[WikiProject:Logos]] mention the image width syntax? | ||
| Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ||
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
==New status?== | ==New status?== | ||
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | ==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | ||
Please check out [[WikiIndex: | Please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||