WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "OptOut" to "Opt out"
m (Text replacement - "{{TOCright}}" to "{{TOC right}}")
m (Text replacement - "OptOut" to "Opt out")
 
Line 135: Line 135:
:: No, I was not specifically thinking about "private" information, when I wrote that. It was intended to be a quick summary of the line between "the seven actions which are blockable offenses" vs. "actions which, while rude and annoying, are not quite bad enough to be blockable".
:: No, I was not specifically thinking about "private" information, when I wrote that. It was intended to be a quick summary of the line between "the seven actions which are blockable offenses" vs. "actions which, while rude and annoying, are not quite bad enough to be blockable".


:: [[Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode|As I have said before]], in my opinion, every publicly-available wiki should be listed on this WikiIndex, no matter how evil. The only exception is when that wiki's owner or that wiki's community chooses to [[WikiIndex:OptOut]]. (Although I don't understand why one would put a wiki on the public web, but not want anyone to know about it, I will respect such wishes).
:: [[Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode|As I have said before]], in my opinion, every publicly-available wiki should be listed on this WikiIndex, no matter how evil. The only exception is when that wiki's owner or that wiki's community chooses to [[WikiIndex:Opt out]]. (Although I don't understand why one would put a wiki on the public web, but not want anyone to know about it, I will respect such wishes).
:: [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#some wiki seem to be blocked|Others]] seem to agree with my "completist" preferences.
:: [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#some wiki seem to be blocked|Others]] seem to agree with my "completist" preferences.
:: You may be able to convince me that we shouldn't display offensive [[:Category:WikiLogo|wiki logos]], and perhaps you may convince me that we shouldn't make an easily-clickable active link to an illegal site. But to completely censor every mention of a wiki? How does "pretend that evil wiki don't exist" help our users?
:: You may be able to convince me that we shouldn't display offensive [[:Category:WikiLogo|wiki logos]], and perhaps you may convince me that we shouldn't make an easily-clickable active link to an illegal site. But to completely censor every mention of a wiki? How does "pretend that evil wiki don't exist" help our users?