Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (rv {{WikiApiary|Farm:Anarchopedia}}) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Public Domain (generic)" to "Public domain (generic)") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Anarchopedia aims to be an experiment in [[:Category:Anarchy|Anarchy]] and anarchistic management. The fact that it is based on a wiki allows a direct co-operative relation between readers and [[editor]]s. The wiki allows creation and the modification by any person of any article. It is a collective tool, which makes it possible the anarchistic encyclopaedia to grow rich by work from all. Anarchopedia does not have [[sysop]]s (i.e., [[leader]]s and a power structure). All registered [[user]]s have sysop permissions. | *Anarchopedia aims to be an experiment in [[:Category:Anarchy|Anarchy]] and anarchistic management. The fact that it is based on a wiki allows a direct co-operative relation between readers and [[editor]]s. The wiki allows creation and the modification by any person of any article. It is a collective tool, which makes it possible the anarchistic encyclopaedia to grow rich by work from all. Anarchopedia does not have [[sysop]]s (i.e., [[leader]]s and a power structure). All registered [[user]]s have sysop permissions. | ||
*Anarchopedia is not intended as a 'discussion forum', nor a '[[:Category:Web|web]] directory'. However, due to the [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software, it is possible for anyone to add comments on articles on its' [[Talk page|discussion page]], including any [[Cambridge-Dictionary:dissent|dissent]] or negative remarks. Anarchopedia is [[Cambridge-Dictionary:anti-capitalist|anti-capitalist]] and anti-[[Cambridge-Dictionary:authoritarian|authoritarian]]. | *Anarchopedia is not intended as a 'discussion forum', nor a '[[:Category:Web|web]] directory'. However, due to the [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software, it is possible for anyone to add comments on articles on its' [[Talk page|discussion page]], including any [[Cambridge-Dictionary:dissent|dissent]] or negative remarks. Anarchopedia is [[Cambridge-Dictionary:anti-capitalist|anti-capitalist]] and anti-[[Cambridge-Dictionary:authoritarian|authoritarian]]. | ||
*The text of Anarchopedia articles are licensed individually,<ref name=License/> with the default being [[:Category:Wiki Public | *The text of Anarchopedia articles are licensed individually,<ref name=License/> with the default being [[:Category:Wiki Public domain (generic)|public domain]] (PD). Several articles are reusable according to terms of the [[:Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]] (GNU FDL or GFDL). Therefore, any individual, company or [[:Category:Organisation|organisation]] can use the most of the contents of Anarchopedia, while conforming under the 'free' terms of the GNU FDL. Some additional restrictions include for [[Cambridge-Dictionary:solidarity|solidarity]] purposes only (that is, the content can only be used to further [[Cambridge-Dictionary:left-winger|left-wing]] anarchist goals), [[:Category:Non-commercial|non-commercial]] purposes, or strictly for use on Anarchopedia itself. | ||
*'Anarchistic points of view' (APOV): ideally, any encyclopaedic writing at Anarchopedia must conform to the anarchistic [[:Category:Point of view|point of view]]. The '[[:Category:NPOV|neutral of point of view]]' (NPOV) policy, as found officially on [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]], is not considered useful on Anarchopedia, because it relies on one central '[[Cambridge-Dictionary:authority|authority]]' that makes decisions regarding the [[Cambridge-Dictionary:neutrality|neutrality]] of an article, and ultimately carries out [[Cambridge-Dictionary:censorship|censorship]] when the article doesn't conform. Naturally, it maybe difficult to arrive to an anarchistic point of view in all the cases. On Anarchopedia, the writing rules aim at being appropriate to the rational people, even if those are not always of the same opinion. The anarchistic points of view state that all the [[Cambridge-Dictionary:facet|facets]] of a discussed point must be evoked according to these points of view, and that the article must in no way be declaring, or implying, or of even [[Cambridge-Dictionary:insinuating|insinuating]], that one of the points of view is that which is correct a [[Cambridge-Dictionary:prioric|priori]]. The anarchistic points of view do not imply however the representation with equality from these various points of view. Anarchopedia naturally grants place for the traditional or recent anarchistic points of view, but not from the 'being asserted' point of view of certain worse anarchistic groupings ('anarchist'-[[Cambridge-Dictionary:capitalist|capitalist]], national-'anarchists', - and in the kind in [[Cambridge-Dictionary:reconversion|reconversion]], or [[Cambridge-Dictionary:reappropriation|reappropriation]], to be made a new image -). [[Cambridge-Dictionary:right wing|Right wing]], pro-state, and pro-capitalist POVs are not welcome on Anarchopedia. Moreover, if a point of view is for example only constant by certain groups of certain specific [[:Category:Ideology|ideological]] tendencies, it will be described as such. | *'Anarchistic points of view' (APOV): ideally, any encyclopaedic writing at Anarchopedia must conform to the anarchistic [[:Category:Point of view|point of view]]. The '[[:Category:NPOV|neutral of point of view]]' (NPOV) policy, as found officially on [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]], is not considered useful on Anarchopedia, because it relies on one central '[[Cambridge-Dictionary:authority|authority]]' that makes decisions regarding the [[Cambridge-Dictionary:neutrality|neutrality]] of an article, and ultimately carries out [[Cambridge-Dictionary:censorship|censorship]] when the article doesn't conform. Naturally, it maybe difficult to arrive to an anarchistic point of view in all the cases. On Anarchopedia, the writing rules aim at being appropriate to the rational people, even if those are not always of the same opinion. The anarchistic points of view state that all the [[Cambridge-Dictionary:facet|facets]] of a discussed point must be evoked according to these points of view, and that the article must in no way be declaring, or implying, or of even [[Cambridge-Dictionary:insinuating|insinuating]], that one of the points of view is that which is correct a [[Cambridge-Dictionary:prioric|priori]]. The anarchistic points of view do not imply however the representation with equality from these various points of view. Anarchopedia naturally grants place for the traditional or recent anarchistic points of view, but not from the 'being asserted' point of view of certain worse anarchistic groupings ('anarchist'-[[Cambridge-Dictionary:capitalist|capitalist]], national-'anarchists', - and in the kind in [[Cambridge-Dictionary:reconversion|reconversion]], or [[Cambridge-Dictionary:reappropriation|reappropriation]], to be made a new image -). [[Cambridge-Dictionary:right wing|Right wing]], pro-state, and pro-capitalist POVs are not welcome on Anarchopedia. Moreover, if a point of view is for example only constant by certain groups of certain specific [[:Category:Ideology|ideological]] tendencies, it will be described as such. | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
[[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | [[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | ||
[[Category:Wiki Custom license]] | [[Category:Wiki Custom license]] | ||
[[Category:Wiki Public | [[Category:Wiki Public domain (generic)]] | ||
[[Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License]]</includeonly> | [[Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License]]</includeonly> | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Anarchopedia| ]] | [[Category:Anarchopedia| ]] | ||
[[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | [[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | ||
edits